Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Risk prediction models for malignancy upgrade in high-risk breast lesions: a qualitative systematic review.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dalton, JC; Nierenberg, TC; Leonard, A; Liang, J; Kaplan, S; Wang, T; Chiba, A; Plichta, JK
Published in: Breast Cancer Res Treat
November 21, 2025

BACKGROUND: Atypical breast lesions are high-risk findings found on some core needle biopsies that may represent concurrent malignancy. Clinical management remains uncertain due to wide variability in reported upgrade rates and an incomplete understanding of contributing risk factors. Risk prediction models have been developed to estimate likelihood of malignant upgrade (from atypia to malignancy), but these models are highly variable in performance and predictor selection. This systematic review evaluates existing models predicting upgrade to malignancy in high-risk breast lesions, focusing on clinical applicability. METHODS: A qualitative systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus identified studies that developed risk prediction models estimating breast malignancy upgrade after atypia diagnosis. Studies analyzing multiple risk factors and providing quantitative risk estimates were included. Extracted data included study characteristics, statistical methods, key predictors, and model performance. Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used for quality assessment. RESULTS: Of the 3202 studies screened, 17 met inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 20 to 525, with reported upgrade rates from 14.9 to 67.3%. Common predictors of upgrade included lesion size, histology, and radiologic-pathologic concordance. Discriminatory performance varied (AUROC 0.514-0.909), and calibration was rarely assessed, limiting reliability. Most studies lacked external validation and exhibited a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Current risk prediction models for malignant upgrade for high-risk lesions demonstrate significant variability and limitations in widespread use. While they may supplement clinical judgment, further external validation and improved calibration are needed before they can reliably guide management.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Breast Cancer Res Treat

DOI

EISSN

1573-7217

Publication Date

November 21, 2025

Volume

215

Issue

1

Start / End Page

3

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Breast
  • Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dalton, J. C., Nierenberg, T. C., Leonard, A., Liang, J., Kaplan, S., Wang, T., … Plichta, J. K. (2025). Risk prediction models for malignancy upgrade in high-risk breast lesions: a qualitative systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 215(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07834-z
Dalton, Juliet C., Tori C. Nierenberg, Austin Leonard, Joey Liang, Samantha Kaplan, Ton Wang, Akiko Chiba, and Jennifer K. Plichta. “Risk prediction models for malignancy upgrade in high-risk breast lesions: a qualitative systematic review.Breast Cancer Res Treat 215, no. 1 (November 21, 2025): 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07834-z.
Dalton JC, Nierenberg TC, Leonard A, Liang J, Kaplan S, Wang T, et al. Risk prediction models for malignancy upgrade in high-risk breast lesions: a qualitative systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Nov 21;215(1):3.
Dalton, Juliet C., et al. “Risk prediction models for malignancy upgrade in high-risk breast lesions: a qualitative systematic review.Breast Cancer Res Treat, vol. 215, no. 1, Nov. 2025, p. 3. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s10549-025-07834-z.
Dalton JC, Nierenberg TC, Leonard A, Liang J, Kaplan S, Wang T, Chiba A, Plichta JK. Risk prediction models for malignancy upgrade in high-risk breast lesions: a qualitative systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Nov 21;215(1):3.
Journal cover image

Published In

Breast Cancer Res Treat

DOI

EISSN

1573-7217

Publication Date

November 21, 2025

Volume

215

Issue

1

Start / End Page

3

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Models, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Breast
  • Biopsy, Large-Core Needle