Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Can L5 be trusted during proximal extension of fusion? A case series and a review of the literature

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cheng, D; Hall, M; Penalosa, B; Danisa, O; Cheng, W
Published in: International Journal of Spine Surgery
June 30, 2020

Background: Debate on whether to stop fusion at L5 or to extend fusion to S1 in a long spinal construct has been a controversial topic in spine surgery. Fewer data are available to support whether to include a prior solid fusion at L4-L5 or to extend to S1 during a proximal extension of fusion to T10. The purpose of this review is to report and discuss 2 cases of L5 vertebra fracture after proximal extension of solid L4-L5 fusion to T10 and to provide a guideline to surgeons based on the available literature. Methods: Case report and literature review. Results: Literature review identified multiple publications with levels of evidence from level 2 to level 4. Advanced L5-S1 degeneration with long-segment fusion to L5 is reported to be greater than 60% with a new rate of symptom development approaching 20%-25%. There is no prior literature specific to L5 fracture development after thoracic lumbar fusion with the lowest instrumented level at a fused L4-L5 segment. Reoperation rate is not consistently affected by the lowest instrumented vertebral level L5 versus sacrum/ilium. Conclusions: Literature review is inconclusive as to the need to include the lumbosacral junction when performing a proximal extension of fusion from L5 to the thoracic spine, especially during a revision adult deformity surgery. Stress of the long lever arm of a long-segment thoracolumbar fusion above a prior solid L4-L5 fusion could cause the L5 vertebra to split in the coronal plane, resulting in vertebral body fracture even with a mildly degenerated disc at L5-S1 prior to surgery.

Duke Scholars

Published In

International Journal of Spine Surgery

DOI

EISSN

2211-4599

Publication Date

June 30, 2020

Volume

14

Issue

3

Start / End Page

321 / 326

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cheng, D., Hall, M., Penalosa, B., Danisa, O., & Cheng, W. (2020). Can L5 be trusted during proximal extension of fusion? A case series and a review of the literature. International Journal of Spine Surgery, 14(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.14444/7043
Cheng, D., M. Hall, B. Penalosa, O. Danisa, and W. Cheng. “Can L5 be trusted during proximal extension of fusion? A case series and a review of the literature.” International Journal of Spine Surgery 14, no. 3 (June 30, 2020): 321–26. https://doi.org/10.14444/7043.
Cheng D, Hall M, Penalosa B, Danisa O, Cheng W. Can L5 be trusted during proximal extension of fusion? A case series and a review of the literature. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2020 Jun 30;14(3):321–6.
Cheng, D., et al. “Can L5 be trusted during proximal extension of fusion? A case series and a review of the literature.” International Journal of Spine Surgery, vol. 14, no. 3, June 2020, pp. 321–26. Scopus, doi:10.14444/7043.
Cheng D, Hall M, Penalosa B, Danisa O, Cheng W. Can L5 be trusted during proximal extension of fusion? A case series and a review of the literature. International Journal of Spine Surgery. 2020 Jun 30;14(3):321–326.
Journal cover image

Published In

International Journal of Spine Surgery

DOI

EISSN

2211-4599

Publication Date

June 30, 2020

Volume

14

Issue

3

Start / End Page

321 / 326

Related Subject Headings

  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1109 Neurosciences