Skip to main content

Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Harianja, G; Razzouk, J; Lindsey, W; Urbina, B; Cabrera, A; Thomas, L; Bouterse, A; Wycliffe, N; Cheng, W; Danisa, O
Published in: J Bone Joint Surg Am
October 4, 2023

BACKGROUND: Although the radiographic parameters for diagnosing central lumbar canal stenosis are well described, parameters for the diagnosis of neuroforaminal stenosis (NFS) are less well defined. Previous studies have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography to describe neuroforaminal dimensions (NFDs). Those methods, however, have limitations that may substantially distort measurements. Existing literature on the use of computed tomography (CT) to investigate normal NFDs is limited. METHODS: This anatomic assessment evaluated CT imaging of 300 female and 300 male subjects between 18 and 35 years of age to determine normal NFDs, specifically the sagittal anteroposterior width, axial anteroposterior width, craniocaudal height, and area. Statistical analyses were performed to assess differences in NFDs according to variables including sex, age, height, weight, body mass index, and ethnicity. RESULTS: Overall, mean NFDs were 9.08 mm for sagittal anteroposterior width, 8.93 mm for axial anteroposterior width, 17.46 mm for craniocaudal height, and 134.78 mm 2 for area (n = 6,000 measurements each). Male subjects had larger NFDs than females at multiple levels. Both Caucasian and Asian subjects had larger NFDs than African-American subjects at multiple levels. There were no associations between foraminal dimensions and anthropometric factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes CT-based L1-S1 NFDs in young, healthy patients who presented with reasons other than back pain or pathology affecting the neuroforamen. Dimensions were influenced by sex and ethnicity but were not influenced by anthropometric factors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Bone Joint Surg Am

DOI

EISSN

1535-1386

Publication Date

October 4, 2023

Volume

105

Issue

19

Start / End Page

1512 / 1518

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Orthopedics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Harianja, G., Razzouk, J., Lindsey, W., Urbina, B., Cabrera, A., Thomas, L., … Danisa, O. (2023). Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 105(19), 1512–1518. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.22.01394
Harianja, Gideon, Jacob Razzouk, Wyatt Lindsey, Bryan Urbina, Andrew Cabrera, Luke Thomas, Alex Bouterse, Nathaniel Wycliffe, Wayne Cheng, and Olumide Danisa. “Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography.J Bone Joint Surg Am 105, no. 19 (October 4, 2023): 1512–18. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.22.01394.
Harianja G, Razzouk J, Lindsey W, Urbina B, Cabrera A, Thomas L, et al. Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1512–8.
Harianja, Gideon, et al. “Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography.J Bone Joint Surg Am, vol. 105, no. 19, Oct. 2023, pp. 1512–18. Pubmed, doi:10.2106/JBJS.22.01394.
Harianja G, Razzouk J, Lindsey W, Urbina B, Cabrera A, Thomas L, Bouterse A, Wycliffe N, Cheng W, Danisa O. Anatomic Assessment of L1-S1 Neuroforaminal Dimensions Using Computed Tomography. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Oct 4;105(19):1512–1518.

Published In

J Bone Joint Surg Am

DOI

EISSN

1535-1386

Publication Date

October 4, 2023

Volume

105

Issue

19

Start / End Page

1512 / 1518

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Orthopedics
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 1103 Clinical Sciences
  • 0903 Biomedical Engineering