Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Using Encounter-Level Data for Risk-Adjustment of Antimicrobial Use Comparisons: Feasibility and Variable Selection.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Moehring, RW; Yarrington, ME; Ashley, ED; Addison, RM; Buckel, WR; Cosgrove, SE; Doughman, D; Klein, E; Santos, CAQ; Spivak, ES; Trick, W ...
Published in: Clin Infect Dis
December 15, 2025

BACKGROUND: External comparisons of hospital antimicrobial use (AU), risk-adjusted using encounter characteristics, may better inform antimicrobial stewardship program strategy. Barriers to encounter-level modeling include feasibility of data collection and defining optimal methods for selecting input variables for risk-adjustment purposes. METHODS: We measured achievements in sharing validated, encounter-level AU data among a multisystem hospital collaborative. Then, we performed retrospective analyses to compare variable selection strategies for AU risk-adjustment models. Electronic health record data from 50 US hospitals from 2020-2021 were split for model training and testing. Four input variable strategies were compared: 1) diagnosis-related group categories, 2) adjudicated Elixhauser comorbidity categories, 3) agnostic strategy including all diagnosis and procedure categories from AHRQ's Clinical Classification Software Refined (CCSR), and 4) adjudicated strategy where CCSR categories not appropriate for risk-adjustment were excluded by expert consensus. Gradient-boosted machine tree-based models estimated antibacterial days of therapy (DOT). Accuracy was measured for each strategy using mean absolute error (MAE); correlation plots compared model estimates and observed DOT among testing encounters. The top 20 most influential variables were defined using model variable importance. RESULTS: Fifty of 76 hospitals successfully shared validated datasets using local resources. MAE was lowest for modeling strategies with larger numbers of CCSR inputs. Agnostic and adjudicated strategies had highly correlated estimates and similar influential variables. CONCLUSIONS: Expert adjudication required personnel effort and potentially introduced biases, yet did not produce results different from an agnostic approach. Risk-adjustment incorporating large encounter-level data and machine learning may prove feasible and meaningful in future hospital AU assessments.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Clin Infect Dis

DOI

EISSN

1537-6591

Publication Date

December 15, 2025

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Microbiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Moehring, R. W., Yarrington, M. E., Ashley, E. D., Addison, R. M., Buckel, W. R., Cosgrove, S. E., … Goldstein, B. A. (2025). Using Encounter-Level Data for Risk-Adjustment of Antimicrobial Use Comparisons: Feasibility and Variable Selection. Clin Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf682
Moehring, Rebekah W., Michael E. Yarrington, Elizabeth Dodds Ashley, Rachel M. Addison, Whitney R. Buckel, Sara E. Cosgrove, Danielle Doughman, et al. “Using Encounter-Level Data for Risk-Adjustment of Antimicrobial Use Comparisons: Feasibility and Variable Selection.Clin Infect Dis, December 15, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf682.
Moehring RW, Yarrington ME, Ashley ED, Addison RM, Buckel WR, Cosgrove SE, et al. Using Encounter-Level Data for Risk-Adjustment of Antimicrobial Use Comparisons: Feasibility and Variable Selection. Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Dec 15;
Moehring, Rebekah W., et al. “Using Encounter-Level Data for Risk-Adjustment of Antimicrobial Use Comparisons: Feasibility and Variable Selection.Clin Infect Dis, Dec. 2025. Pubmed, doi:10.1093/cid/ciaf682.
Moehring RW, Yarrington ME, Ashley ED, Addison RM, Buckel WR, Cosgrove SE, Doughman D, Klein E, Santos CAQ, Spivak ES, Trick W, Smith M, Weber DJ, Zhao C, Anderson DJ, Goldstein BA. Using Encounter-Level Data for Risk-Adjustment of Antimicrobial Use Comparisons: Feasibility and Variable Selection. Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Dec 15;
Journal cover image

Published In

Clin Infect Dis

DOI

EISSN

1537-6591

Publication Date

December 15, 2025

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Microbiology
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
  • 11 Medical and Health Sciences
  • 06 Biological Sciences