Skip to main content

Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: timing and duration of sonographic surveillance for detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Carver, A; Haeri, S; Moldenhauer, J; Wolfe, HM; Goodnight, W
Published in: J Ultrasound Med
March 2011

OBJECTIVE: Twin-twin transfusion syndrome complicates up to 15% of monochorionic diamniotic gestations. Current recommendations for sonographic surveillance in monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies for detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome vary. Our objective was to determine an appropriate frequency of sonographic surveillance to optimize detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome in monochorionic diamniotic gestations. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of all nonanomalous monochorionic diamniotic twins delivered at the University of North Carolina over a 9-year period was performed. The rate and gestational age of twin-twin transfusion syndrome onset were calculated. The time to the diagnosis of twin-twin transfusion syndrome was evaluated by a Kaplan-Meier survival curve; clinical factors at initial sonography were examined for their use in prediction of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. RESULTS: Of the 577 twin deliveries, 145 (25%) were monochorionic diamniotic and included for analysis. The rate of twin-twin transfusion syndrome was 17.93% (n = 26). The mean frequency of surveillance ± SD before diagnosis of twin-twin transfusion syndrome was 3.1 ± 2.1 weeks. The mean gestational age at diagnosis of twin-twin transfusion syndrome was 21.3 ± 3.4 weeks (range, 15-29 weeks). Both a discordant maximum vertical amniotic fluid pocket (>65% difference) and a discordant estimated fetal weight (>25% difference) at initial sonography showed a significantly shorter time to diagnosis of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome should begin in the second trimester. Weekly surveillance for those pregnancies with estimated fetal weight or maximum vertical pocket discordance is recommended. For those with a concordant estimated fetal weight and maximum vertical pocket, sonographic evaluation every 2 weeks is warranted to 28 to 30 weeks. After that, development of twin-twin transfusion syndrome is less likely, and a different paradigm of antenatal testing may be reasonable.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Ultrasound Med

DOI

EISSN

1550-9613

Publication Date

March 2011

Volume

30

Issue

3

Start / End Page

297 / 301

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal
  • Twins, Monozygotic
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Prevalence
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Population Surveillance
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • North Carolina
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Carver, A., Haeri, S., Moldenhauer, J., Wolfe, H. M., & Goodnight, W. (2011). Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: timing and duration of sonographic surveillance for detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Ultrasound Med, 30(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.297
Carver, Alissa, Sina Haeri, Julie Moldenhauer, Honor M. Wolfe, and William Goodnight. “Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: timing and duration of sonographic surveillance for detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.J Ultrasound Med 30, no. 3 (March 2011): 297–301. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.297.
Carver A, Haeri S, Moldenhauer J, Wolfe HM, Goodnight W. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: timing and duration of sonographic surveillance for detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Mar;30(3):297–301.
Carver, Alissa, et al. “Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: timing and duration of sonographic surveillance for detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome.J Ultrasound Med, vol. 30, no. 3, Mar. 2011, pp. 297–301. Pubmed, doi:10.7863/jum.2011.30.3.297.
Carver A, Haeri S, Moldenhauer J, Wolfe HM, Goodnight W. Monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: timing and duration of sonographic surveillance for detection of twin-twin transfusion syndrome. J Ultrasound Med. 2011 Mar;30(3):297–301.

Published In

J Ultrasound Med

DOI

EISSN

1550-9613

Publication Date

March 2011

Volume

30

Issue

3

Start / End Page

297 / 301

Location

England

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography, Prenatal
  • Twins, Monozygotic
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Prevalence
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Population Surveillance
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • North Carolina