Skip to main content

Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Biber, J; Ose, D; Reese, J; Gardiner, A; Facelli, J; Spuhl, J; Brodke, D; Lee, VS; Hess, R; Weeks, H
Published in: J Patient Rep Outcomes
2017

AIM: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have traditionally been implemented through a manual process of paper and pencil with little standardization throughout a Healthcare System. Each practice has asked patients specific questions to understand the patient's health as it pertains to their specialty. These data were rarely shared and there has not been a comparison of patient's health across different specialty domains. We sought to leverage interoperable electronic systems to provide a standardization of PRO assessments across sites of care. METHODS: University of Utah Health is comprised of four hospitals, 12 community clinics, over 400,000 unique annual patients, and more than 5000 providers. The enterprise wide implementation of PROs started in November of 2015. Patients can complete an assessment at home via email, or within the clinic on a tablet. Each specialty has the opportunity to add additional specialty-specific instruments. We customized the interval with which the patient answers the assessments based on specialty preference in order to minimize patient burden, while maximizing relevant data for clinicians. RESULTS: Barriers and facilitators were identified in three phases: Pre-implementation, Implementation, and Post-implementation. Each phase was further broken down into technical challenges, content inclusion and exclusion, and organizational strategy. These phases are unique and require collaboration between several groups throughout the organization with support from executive leadership. DISCUSSION: We are deploying system-wide standard and customized PRO collection with the goals of providing better patient care, improving physician-patient communication, and ultimately improving the value of the care given. Standardized assessment provides any clinician with information to quickly evaluate the overall, physical and mental health of a patient. This information is available real time to aid in patient communication for the clinician.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Patient Rep Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

2509-8020

Publication Date

2017

Volume

2

Start / End Page

34

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Biber, J., Ose, D., Reese, J., Gardiner, A., Facelli, J., Spuhl, J., … Weeks, H. (2017). Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. J Patient Rep Outcomes, 2, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0059-0
Biber, Joshua, Dominik Ose, Jenny Reese, Anna Gardiner, Julio Facelli, Joshua Spuhl, Darrel Brodke, Vivian S. Lee, Rachel Hess, and Howard Weeks. “Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting.J Patient Rep Outcomes 2 (2017): 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0059-0.
Biber J, Ose D, Reese J, Gardiner A, Facelli J, Spuhl J, et al. Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2:34.
Biber, Joshua, et al. “Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting.J Patient Rep Outcomes, vol. 2, 2017, p. 34. Pubmed, doi:10.1186/s41687-018-0059-0.
Biber J, Ose D, Reese J, Gardiner A, Facelli J, Spuhl J, Brodke D, Lee VS, Hess R, Weeks H. Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;2:34.

Published In

J Patient Rep Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

2509-8020

Publication Date

2017

Volume

2

Start / End Page

34

Location

Germany

Related Subject Headings

  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences