Protectionism, labor mobility, and immiserizing growth in developing economics
Publication
, Journal Article
Gilbert, J; Tower, E
Published in: Economics Letters
March 1, 2002
In a small, tariff-ridden, developing economy with imperfect labor mobility, we show that capital accumulation may not immiserize even with foreign rent repatriation. Employment creation effects can outweigh losses in tariff revenue. With perfect immobility, immiserization cannot occur without repatriation. © 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Economics Letters
DOI
ISSN
0165-1765
Publication Date
March 1, 2002
Volume
75
Issue
1
Start / End Page
135 / 140
Related Subject Headings
- Economics
- 38 Economics
- 14 Economics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gilbert, J., & Tower, E. (2002). Protectionism, labor mobility, and immiserizing growth in developing economics. Economics Letters, 75(1), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00586-9
Gilbert, J., and E. Tower. “Protectionism, labor mobility, and immiserizing growth in developing economics.” Economics Letters 75, no. 1 (March 1, 2002): 135–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00586-9.
Gilbert J, Tower E. Protectionism, labor mobility, and immiserizing growth in developing economics. Economics Letters. 2002 Mar 1;75(1):135–40.
Gilbert, J., and E. Tower. “Protectionism, labor mobility, and immiserizing growth in developing economics.” Economics Letters, vol. 75, no. 1, Mar. 2002, pp. 135–40. Scopus, doi:10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00586-9.
Gilbert J, Tower E. Protectionism, labor mobility, and immiserizing growth in developing economics. Economics Letters. 2002 Mar 1;75(1):135–140.
Published In
Economics Letters
DOI
ISSN
0165-1765
Publication Date
March 1, 2002
Volume
75
Issue
1
Start / End Page
135 / 140
Related Subject Headings
- Economics
- 38 Economics
- 14 Economics