Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Sedlis, SP; Morrison, DA; Lorin, JD; Esposito, R; Sethi, G; Sacks, J; Henderson, W; Grover, F; Ramanathan, KB; Weiman, D; Saucedo, J; Pett, S ...
Published in: J Am Coll Cardiol
November 6, 2002

OBJECTIVES: This study compared survival after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) among diabetics in the Veterans Affairs AWESOME (Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation) study randomized trial and registry of high-risk patients. BACKGROUND: Previous studies indicate that CABG may be superior to PCI for diabetics, but no comparisons have been made for diabetics at high risk for surgery. METHODS: Over five years (1995 to 2000), 2,431 patients with medically refractory myocardial ischemia and at least one of five risk factors (prior CABG, myocardial infarction within seven days, left ventricular ejection fraction <0.35, age >70 years, or an intra-aortic balloon being required to stabilize) were identified. A total of 781 were acceptable for CABG and PCI, and 454 consented to be randomized. The 1,650 patients not acceptable for both CABG and PCI constitute the physician-directed registry, and the 327 who were acceptable but refused to be randomized constitute the patient-choice registry. Diabetes prevalence was 32% (144) among randomized patients, 27% (89) in the patient-choice registry, and 32% (525) in the physician-directed registry. The CABG and PCI survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The respective CABG and PCI 36-month survival rates for diabetic patients were 72% and 81% for randomized patients, 85% and 89% for patient-choice registry patients, and 73% and 71% for the physician-directed registry patients. None of the differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that PCI is a relatively safe alternative to CABG for diabetic patients with medically refractory unstable angina who are at high risk for CABG.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

November 6, 2002

Volume

40

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1555 / 1566

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Registries
  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Selection
  • Humans
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Diabetes Complications
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Sedlis, S. P., Morrison, D. A., Lorin, J. D., Esposito, R., Sethi, G., Sacks, J., … Investigators of the Dept. of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME), . (2002). Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry. J Am Coll Cardiol, 40(9), 1555–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02346-x
Sedlis, Steven P., Douglass A. Morrison, Jeffrey D. Lorin, Rick Esposito, Gulshan Sethi, Jerome Sacks, William Henderson, et al. “Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry.J Am Coll Cardiol 40, no. 9 (November 6, 2002): 1555–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02346-x.
Sedlis SP, Morrison DA, Lorin JD, Esposito R, Sethi G, Sacks J, Henderson W, Grover F, Ramanathan KB, Weiman D, Saucedo J, Antakli T, Paramesh V, Pett S, Vernon S, Birjiniuk V, Welt F, Krucoff M, Wolfe W, Lucke JC, Mediratta S, Booth D, Murphy E, Ward H, Miller L, Kiesz S, Barbiere C, Lewis D, Investigators of the Dept. of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study #385, the Angina With Extremely Serious Operative Mortality Evaluation (AWESOME). Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary bypass graft surgery for diabetic patients with unstable angina and risk factors for adverse outcomes with bypass: outcome of diabetic patients in the AWESOME randomized trial and registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Nov 6;40(9):1555–1566.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Am Coll Cardiol

DOI

ISSN

0735-1097

Publication Date

November 6, 2002

Volume

40

Issue

9

Start / End Page

1555 / 1566

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Survival Rate
  • Risk Factors
  • Registries
  • Prospective Studies
  • Patient Selection
  • Humans
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Diabetes Complications