Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology
Publication
, Journal Article
Staddon, JER
Published in: Behavior and Philosophy
December 1, 2004
E.O. Wilson and B.F. Skinner have argued for an evolutionary ethics that allows what ought to be to be derived from what is-ethics from science. Evolution is inherently unpredictable, however, and some practices whose benefits cannot be proved might nevertheless turn out to be good for the survival of a culture or the race. Other practices that seem to be good might turn out to be bad. Consequently, the evolutionary - argument implies that a successful culture will believe some things that cannot be proved, and it tells us that we cannot know in advance what those things will be.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Behavior and Philosophy
ISSN
1053-8348
Publication Date
December 1, 2004
Volume
32
Issue
1
Start / End Page
231 / 242
Related Subject Headings
- Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
- 5003 Philosophy
- 2203 Philosophy
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Staddon, J. E. R. (2004). Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology. Behavior and Philosophy, 32(1), 231–242.
Staddon, J. E. R. “Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology.” Behavior and Philosophy 32, no. 1 (December 1, 2004): 231–42.
Staddon JER. Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology. Behavior and Philosophy. 2004 Dec 1;32(1):231–42.
Staddon, J. E. R. “Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology.” Behavior and Philosophy, vol. 32, no. 1, Dec. 2004, pp. 231–42.
Staddon JER. Scientific imperialism and behaviorist epistemology. Behavior and Philosophy. 2004 Dec 1;32(1):231–242.
Published In
Behavior and Philosophy
ISSN
1053-8348
Publication Date
December 1, 2004
Volume
32
Issue
1
Start / End Page
231 / 242
Related Subject Headings
- Behavioral Science & Comparative Psychology
- 5003 Philosophy
- 2203 Philosophy
- 1702 Cognitive Sciences
- 1701 Psychology