Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Screening for lung cancer: a review of the current literature.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bach, PB; Kelley, MJ; Tate, RC; McCrory, DC
Published in: Chest
January 2003

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To review the available data on the early detection of lung cancer, with a focus on three technologies: chest x-ray (CXR), sputum cytology, and low-dose CT (LDCT) scanning. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Review of published clinical studies of early detection technologies. The best available evidence on each topic was selected for analysis. Randomized trials were used to evaluate CXR and sputum cytology. Cohort studies, as well as studies providing evidence regarding rates of overdiagnosis and efficacy of initial treatment, were considered in evaluation of LDCT. Study design and results were summarized in evidence tables. Statistical analyses of combined data were not performed. MEASUREMENT AND RESULTS: Five randomized trials of CXR with or without sputum cytology have been conducted, each which reports disease-specific mortality as well as other end points. None of these studies provide support for the use of either CXR or sputum cytology for the early detection of lung cancer in asymptomatic individuals. Eight completed and ongoing trials of LDCT were identified. All of these studies report the frequency and stage distribution of lung cancers found during initial ("prevalence") screening, and several studies also report rates of detection at the time of annual follow-up. No outcome data on survival or treatment are available. A number of studies support the hypothesis of "overdiagnosis"--that some lung cancers detected by LDCT may behave in an indolent manner. CONCLUSIONS: The use of either CXR or sputum cytology for the early detection of lung cancer is not supported by the published evidence. The evidence for LDCT appears promising, in that the technology typically identifies lung cancer at an early stage, although corollary studies suggest that these findings in isolation may be misleading. Further high-quality research is needed to better define the role of LDCT in the evaluation of asymptomatic high-risk individuals.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Chest

DOI

ISSN

0012-3692

Publication Date

January 2003

Volume

123

Issue

1 Suppl

Start / End Page

72S / 82S

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sputum
  • Respiratory System
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Mass Screening
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Cohort Studies
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bach, P. B., Kelley, M. J., Tate, R. C., & McCrory, D. C. (2003). Screening for lung cancer: a review of the current literature. Chest, 123(1 Suppl), 72S-82S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.72s
Bach, Peter B., Michael J. Kelley, Ramsey C. Tate, and Douglas C. McCrory. “Screening for lung cancer: a review of the current literature.Chest 123, no. 1 Suppl (January 2003): 72S-82S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.72s.
Bach PB, Kelley MJ, Tate RC, McCrory DC. Screening for lung cancer: a review of the current literature. Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1 Suppl):72S-82S.
Bach, Peter B., et al. “Screening for lung cancer: a review of the current literature.Chest, vol. 123, no. 1 Suppl, Jan. 2003, pp. 72S-82S. Pubmed, doi:10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.72s.
Bach PB, Kelley MJ, Tate RC, McCrory DC. Screening for lung cancer: a review of the current literature. Chest. 2003 Jan;123(1 Suppl):72S-82S.
Journal cover image

Published In

Chest

DOI

ISSN

0012-3692

Publication Date

January 2003

Volume

123

Issue

1 Suppl

Start / End Page

72S / 82S

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • Sputum
  • Respiratory System
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Radiography, Thoracic
  • Mass Screening
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Humans
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Cohort Studies