Methodology and grading for pulmonary hypertension evidence review and guideline development.
Publication
, Journal Article
McCrory, DC; Lewis, SZ
Published in: Chest
July 2004
The American College of Chest Physicians assembled a multidisciplinary, geographically diverse panel of experts in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension to develop clinically relevant practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension in its many variations. That group of experts produced recommendations covering five topic areas, each related to a distinct set of patient-management decisions. This article describes the approach used to develop the guidelines, including identifying, evaluating, and synthesizing the evidence, assessing the strength of evidence pertinent to individual guidelines, and grading guideline recommendations.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
Chest
DOI
ISSN
0012-3692
Publication Date
July 2004
Volume
126
Issue
1 Suppl
Start / End Page
11S / 13S
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Societies, Medical
- Respiratory System
- Pulmonary Artery
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Hypertension, Pulmonary
- Humans
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1103 Clinical Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
McCrory, D. C., & Lewis, S. Z. (2004). Methodology and grading for pulmonary hypertension evidence review and guideline development. Chest, 126(1 Suppl), 11S-13S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.1_suppl.11S
McCrory, Douglas C., and Sandra Zelman Lewis. “Methodology and grading for pulmonary hypertension evidence review and guideline development.” Chest 126, no. 1 Suppl (July 2004): 11S-13S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.1_suppl.11S.
McCrory DC, Lewis SZ. Methodology and grading for pulmonary hypertension evidence review and guideline development. Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1 Suppl):11S-13S.
McCrory, Douglas C., and Sandra Zelman Lewis. “Methodology and grading for pulmonary hypertension evidence review and guideline development.” Chest, vol. 126, no. 1 Suppl, July 2004, pp. 11S-13S. Pubmed, doi:10.1378/chest.126.1_suppl.11S.
McCrory DC, Lewis SZ. Methodology and grading for pulmonary hypertension evidence review and guideline development. Chest. 2004 Jul;126(1 Suppl):11S-13S.
Published In
Chest
DOI
ISSN
0012-3692
Publication Date
July 2004
Volume
126
Issue
1 Suppl
Start / End Page
11S / 13S
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Societies, Medical
- Respiratory System
- Pulmonary Artery
- Practice Guidelines as Topic
- Hypertension, Pulmonary
- Humans
- Evidence-Based Medicine
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 3201 Cardiovascular medicine and haematology
- 1103 Clinical Sciences