Skip to main content

Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Guller, U; Jain, N; Hervey, S; Purves, H; Pietrobon, R
Published in: Arch Surg
November 2003

HYPOTHESIS: Laparoscopic colectomy has significant advantages over open colectomy in the treatment of diverticular disease with respect to the length of hospital stay, routine hospital discharge, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective secondary data analysis. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Patients with primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes for laparoscopic (709 patients [3.8%]) and open sigmoid resection (17 735 patients [96.2%]) were selected from the 1998, 1999, and 2000 Nationwide Inpatient Samples. These databases represent 20% stratified probability samples of all US community hospital discharges. Sampling weights were used to allow generalization of the study findings to the overall US population. Multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the risk-adjusted association between the surgery type and patient outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of hospital stay, in-hospital complications, in-hospital mortality, and the rate of routine discharge. RESULTS: The patients had a mean age of 59.8 years; they were preponderantly white (89.1%) and female (54.0%). After adjusting for other covariates, laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was associated with a shorter mean hospital stay (laparoscopic sigmoidectomy vs open sigmoidectomy, 7.47 vs 9.37 days; P<.001), fewer gastrointestinal tract complications (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.93; P =.03), a lower overall complication rate (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.47-0.88; P =.007), and a higher routine hospital discharge rate (odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-3.21; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection in patients with diverticular disease has statistically and clinically significant advantages over open sigmoid resection with respect to the length of hospital stay, rate of routine hospital discharge, and postoperative in-hospital morbidity.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Arch Surg

DOI

ISSN

0004-0010

Publication Date

November 2003

Volume

138

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1179 / 1186

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Discharge
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Length of Stay
  • Laparoscopy
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Guller, U., Jain, N., Hervey, S., Purves, H., & Pietrobon, R. (2003). Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg, 138(11), 1179–1186. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1179
Guller, Ulrich, Nitin Jain, Sheleika Hervey, Harriett Purves, and Ricardo Pietrobon. “Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases.Arch Surg 138, no. 11 (November 2003): 1179–86. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1179.
Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg. 2003 Nov;138(11):1179–86.
Guller, Ulrich, et al. “Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases.Arch Surg, vol. 138, no. 11, Nov. 2003, pp. 1179–86. Pubmed, doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1179.
Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, Purves H, Pietrobon R. Laparoscopic vs open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg. 2003 Nov;138(11):1179–1186.

Published In

Arch Surg

DOI

ISSN

0004-0010

Publication Date

November 2003

Volume

138

Issue

11

Start / End Page

1179 / 1186

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Surgery
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Patient Discharge
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Length of Stay
  • Laparoscopy
  • Humans