From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
Publication
, Journal Article
Paris, JJ; Ferranti, J; Reardon, F
Published in: The Journal of clinical ethics
January 2001
Duke Scholars
Published In
The Journal of clinical ethics
DOI
EISSN
1945-5879
ISSN
1046-7890
Publication Date
January 2001
Volume
12
Issue
3
Start / End Page
207 / 214
Related Subject Headings
- Withholding Treatment
- United States
- Treatment Refusal
- Third-Party Consent
- Quality of Life
- Professional Autonomy
- Parents
- Parental Consent
- Morals
- Medical Futility
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Paris, J. J., Ferranti, J., & Reardon, F. (2001). From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases? The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 12(3), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1086/jce200112303
Paris, J. J., J. Ferranti, and F. Reardon. “From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?” The Journal of Clinical Ethics 12, no. 3 (January 2001): 207–14. https://doi.org/10.1086/jce200112303.
Paris JJ, Ferranti J, Reardon F. From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases? The Journal of clinical ethics. 2001 Jan;12(3):207–14.
Paris, J. J., et al. “From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?” The Journal of Clinical Ethics, vol. 12, no. 3, Jan. 2001, pp. 207–14. Epmc, doi:10.1086/jce200112303.
Paris JJ, Ferranti J, Reardon F. From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases? The Journal of clinical ethics. 2001 Jan;12(3):207–214.
Published In
The Journal of clinical ethics
DOI
EISSN
1945-5879
ISSN
1046-7890
Publication Date
January 2001
Volume
12
Issue
3
Start / End Page
207 / 214
Related Subject Headings
- Withholding Treatment
- United States
- Treatment Refusal
- Third-Party Consent
- Quality of Life
- Professional Autonomy
- Parents
- Parental Consent
- Morals
- Medical Futility