Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lederle, FA; Simel, DL
Published in: JAMA
January 6, 1999

In the physical examination of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), the only maneuver of demonstrated value is abdominal palpation to detect abnormal widening of the aortic pulsation. Palpation of AAA appears to be safe and has not been reported to precipitate rupture. The best evidence on the accuracy of abdominal palpation comes from 15 studies of patients not previously known to have AAA who were screened with both abdominal palpation and ultrasound. When results from these studies are pooled, the sensitivity of abdominal palpation increases significantly with AAA diameter (P<.001), ranging from 29% for AAAs of 3.0 to 3.9 cm to 50% for AAAs of 4.0 to 4.9 cm and 76% for AAAs of 5.0 cm or greater. Positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a cutoff point for AAAs of 3.0 cm or greater are 12.0 (95% CI, 7.4-19.5) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81), respectively, and for AAAs of 4.0 cm or greater are 15.6 (95% CI, 8.6-28.5) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38-0.67). The positive predictive value of palpation for AAA of 3.0 cm or greater in these studies was 43%. Limited data suggest that abdominal obesity decreases the sensitivity of palpation. Abdominal palpation specifically directed at measuring aortic width has moderate sensitivity for detecting an AAA that would be large enough to be referred for surgery but cannot be relied on to exclude AAA, especially if rupture is a possibility.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

JAMA

DOI

ISSN

0098-7484

Publication Date

January 6, 1999

Volume

281

Issue

1

Start / End Page

77 / 82

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Physical Examination
  • Palpation
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
  • Aneurysm, Ruptured
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lederle, F. A., & Simel, D. L. (1999). The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA, 281(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.1.77
Lederle, F. A., and D. L. Simel. “The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?JAMA 281, no. 1 (January 6, 1999): 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.1.77.
Lederle, F. A., and D. L. Simel. “The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?JAMA, vol. 281, no. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 77–82. Pubmed, doi:10.1001/jama.281.1.77.
Journal cover image

Published In

JAMA

DOI

ISSN

0098-7484

Publication Date

January 6, 1999

Volume

281

Issue

1

Start / End Page

77 / 82

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Ultrasonography
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Physical Examination
  • Palpation
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
  • Aneurysm, Ruptured
  • 42 Health sciences
  • 32 Biomedical and clinical sciences