Skip to main content

Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Edelman, D; Olsen, MK; Dudley, TK; Harris, AC; Oddone, EZ
Published in: Diabetes Care
June 2002

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of a chronic illness can have a negative impact on patients' perception of their well-being ("labeling" effect). We sought to determine the effects of a new diagnosis of diabetes, discovered by systematic screening, on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 1 year after diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed diabetes screening at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center of 1,253 outpatients, aged 45-64 years, who did not report having diabetes. Our initial screen was a serum HbA(1c) measurement. All subjects with HbA(1c) > or = 6.0% were invited for follow-up measurement of blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose. A case of unrecognized diabetes was defined as HbA(1c) > or = 7.0% or fasting plasma glucose > or = 7 mmol/dl. HRQoL was measured by Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) for all patients at baseline and 1 year after enrollment. Linear multivariable models were used to determine the independent effect of the new diagnosis of diabetes on HRQoL. RESULTS: Mean SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) for all patients was 36.2, and mean Mental Component Score (MCS) was 49.6. A total of 56 patients (4.5%) were found to have diabetes at screening. Patients found to have diabetes at screening had mean PCS of 35.6, which was not different from a mean PCS of 36.3 for those patients found not to have diabetes (P = 0.67). After adjusting for baseline PCS values, PCS 1 year after screening was similar for patients with and without diabetes found at screening (P = 0.95). Similarly, patients found to have diabetes at screening had mean MCS of 48.8; those found not to have diabetes had MCS of 49.6 (P = 0.70). After adjusting for baseline MCS values, MCS 1 year after screening was also similar between the two groups (P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes discovered through systematic screening, HRQoL is similar to patients found not to have diabetes. Furthermore, HRQoL scores remain stable over the year after screening. This suggests that screening for diabetes has minimal, if any, "labeling" effect with respect to HRQoL.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Diabetes Care

DOI

ISSN

0149-5992

Publication Date

June 2002

Volume

25

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1022 / 1026

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Racial Groups
  • Quality of Life
  • Obesity
  • North Carolina
  • Middle Aged
  • Mass Screening
  • Male
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Edelman, D., Olsen, M. K., Dudley, T. K., Harris, A. C., & Oddone, E. Z. (2002). Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life. Diabetes Care, 25(6), 1022–1026. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.6.1022
Edelman, David, Maren K. Olsen, Tara K. Dudley, Amy C. Harris, and Eugene Z. Oddone. “Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life.Diabetes Care 25, no. 6 (June 2002): 1022–26. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.6.1022.
Edelman D, Olsen MK, Dudley TK, Harris AC, Oddone EZ. Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jun;25(6):1022–6.
Edelman, David, et al. “Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life.Diabetes Care, vol. 25, no. 6, June 2002, pp. 1022–26. Pubmed, doi:10.2337/diacare.25.6.1022.
Edelman D, Olsen MK, Dudley TK, Harris AC, Oddone EZ. Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life. Diabetes Care. 2002 Jun;25(6):1022–1026.

Published In

Diabetes Care

DOI

ISSN

0149-5992

Publication Date

June 2002

Volume

25

Issue

6

Start / End Page

1022 / 1026

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Racial Groups
  • Quality of Life
  • Obesity
  • North Carolina
  • Middle Aged
  • Mass Screening
  • Male
  • Humans