Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schubert, MC; Migliaccio, AA; Clendaniel, RA; Allak, A; Carey, JP
Published in: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
March 2008

OBJECTIVE: To determine why dynamic visual acuity (DVA) improves after vestibular rehabilitation in people with vestibular hypofunction. DESIGN: Combined descriptive and intervention study. SETTING: Outpatient department in an academic medical institution. PARTICIPANTS: Five patients (age, 42-66 y) and 4 age-matched controls (age, 39-67 y) were studied. Patients had vestibular hypofunction (mean duration, 177+/-188 d) identified by clinical (positive head thrust test, abnormal DVA), physiologic (reduced angular vestibulo-ocular reflex [aVOR] gain during passive head thrust testing), and imaging examinations (absence of tumor in the internal auditory canals or cerebellopontine angle). INTERVENTION: Vestibular rehabilitation focused on gaze and gait stabilization (mean, 5.0+/-1.4 visits; mean, 66+/-24 d). The control group did not receive any intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: aVOR gain (eye velocity/head velocity) during DVA testing (active head rotation) and horizontal head thrust testing (passive head rotation) to control for spontaneous recovery. RESULTS: For all patients, DVA improved (mean, 51%+/-25%; range, 21%-81%). aVOR gain during the active DVA test increased in each of the patients (mean range, 0.7+/-0.2 to 0.9+/-0.2 [35%]). aVOR gain during passive head thrust did not improve in 3 patients and improved only partially in the other 2. For control subjects, aVOR gain during DVA was near 1. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that vestibular rehabilitation increases aVOR gain during active head rotation independent of peripheral aVOR gain recovery.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1532-821X

Publication Date

March 2008

Volume

89

Issue

3

Start / End Page

500 / 507

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Acuity
  • Vestibular Function Tests
  • Vestibular Diseases
  • Vertigo
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular
  • Reference Values
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schubert, M. C., Migliaccio, A. A., Clendaniel, R. A., Allak, A., & Carey, J. P. (2008). Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 89(3), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.010
Schubert, Michael C., Americo A. Migliaccio, Richard A. Clendaniel, Amir Allak, and John P. Carey. “Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil 89, no. 3 (March 2008): 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.010.
Schubert MC, Migliaccio AA, Clendaniel RA, Allak A, Carey JP. Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):500–7.
Schubert, Michael C., et al. “Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation.Arch Phys Med Rehabil, vol. 89, no. 3, Mar. 2008, pp. 500–07. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.010.
Schubert MC, Migliaccio AA, Clendaniel RA, Allak A, Carey JP. Mechanism of dynamic visual acuity recovery with vestibular rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):500–507.
Journal cover image

Published In

Arch Phys Med Rehabil

DOI

EISSN

1532-821X

Publication Date

March 2008

Volume

89

Issue

3

Start / End Page

500 / 507

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Visual Acuity
  • Vestibular Function Tests
  • Vestibular Diseases
  • Vertigo
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Risk Assessment
  • Rehabilitation
  • Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular
  • Reference Values