Skip to main content

Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Samei, E; Seibert, JA; Willis, CE; Flynn, MJ; Mah, E; Junck, KL
Published in: Med Phys
March 2001

Recommended methods to test the performance of computed radiography (CR) digital radiographic systems have been recently developed by the AAPM Task Group No. 10. Included are tests for dark noise, uniformity, exposure response, laser beam function, spatial resolution, low-contrast resolution, spatial accuracy, erasure thoroughness, and throughput. The recommendations may be used for acceptance testing of new CR devices as well as routine performance evaluation checks of devices in clinical use. The purpose of this short communication is to provide a tabular summary of the tests recommended by the AAPM Task Group, delineate the technical aspects of the tests, suggest quantitative measures of the performance results, and recommend uniform quantitative criteria for the satisfactory performance of CR devices. The applicability of the acceptance criteria is verified by tests performed on CR systems in clinical use at five different institutions. This paper further clarifies the recommendations with respect to the beam filtration to be used for exposure calibration of the system, and the calibration of automatic exposure control systems.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

28

Issue

3

Start / End Page

361 / 371

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiography
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Lasers
  • Calibration
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Samei, E., Seibert, J. A., Willis, C. E., Flynn, M. J., Mah, E., & Junck, K. L. (2001). Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. Med Phys, 28(3), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1350586
Samei, E., J. A. Seibert, C. E. Willis, M. J. Flynn, E. Mah, and K. L. Junck. “Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems.Med Phys 28, no. 3 (March 2001): 361–71. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1350586.
Samei E, Seibert JA, Willis CE, Flynn MJ, Mah E, Junck KL. Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. Med Phys. 2001 Mar;28(3):361–71.
Samei, E., et al. “Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems.Med Phys, vol. 28, no. 3, Mar. 2001, pp. 361–71. Pubmed, doi:10.1118/1.1350586.
Samei E, Seibert JA, Willis CE, Flynn MJ, Mah E, Junck KL. Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems. Med Phys. 2001 Mar;28(3):361–371.

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

March 2001

Volume

28

Issue

3

Start / End Page

361 / 371

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiography
  • Phantoms, Imaging
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Lasers
  • Calibration
  • 5105 Medical and biological physics
  • 4003 Biomedical engineering
  • 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis