Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schindera, ST; Merkle, EM; Dale, BM; Delong, DM; Nelson, RC
Published in: Acad Radiol
October 2006

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to calculate the gain in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of four human abdominal tissues at 3.0 Tesla (T) compared with standard 1.5 T and to validate this calculation in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expected gain in SNR at 3.0 T in the liver, pancreas, spleen, and kidney compared with standard 1.5 T was approximated theoretically for a T2-weighted HASTE (half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) and a T1-weighted gradient-echo in- and opposed-phase sequence. Fifteen healthy male subjects underwent abdominal MR imaging using a 1.5 T and 3.0 T scanner. Coronal T2-weighted HASTE images and axial T1-weighted gradient-echo in- and opposed-phase images were acquired using the sequence parameters optimized by the vendor. RESULTS: Except for opposed-phased imaging of pancreatic tissue, in vivo adjusted SNR values of all abdominal tissues were significantly higher at 3.0 T for all sequences (P < .05). The highest overall gain in SNR was achieved with the HASTE sequence ranging from 3.8-fold for renal imaging to 7.4-fold for hepatic imaging. The theoretical calculation of SNR gain was in good agreement with the experimentally measured gain in SNR for the HASTE and the in-phase sequence. CONCLUSION: High-field abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T offers significantly higher SNR compared with standard 1.5 T MR imaging.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Acad Radiol

DOI

ISSN

1076-6332

Publication Date

October 2006

Volume

13

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1236 / 1243

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Viscera
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Male
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Image Enhancement
  • Humans
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schindera, S. T., Merkle, E. M., Dale, B. M., Delong, D. M., & Nelson, R. C. (2006). Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? Acad Radiol, 13(10), 1236–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.018
Schindera, Sebastian T., Elmar M. Merkle, Brian M. Dale, David M. Delong, and Rendon C. Nelson. “Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?Acad Radiol 13, no. 10 (October 2006): 1236–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.018.
Schindera ST, Merkle EM, Dale BM, Delong DM, Nelson RC. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(10):1236–43.
Schindera, Sebastian T., et al. “Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio?Acad Radiol, vol. 13, no. 10, Oct. 2006, pp. 1236–43. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.018.
Schindera ST, Merkle EM, Dale BM, Delong DM, Nelson RC. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T what is the ultimate gain in signal-to-noise ratio? Acad Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(10):1236–1243.
Journal cover image

Published In

Acad Radiol

DOI

ISSN

1076-6332

Publication Date

October 2006

Volume

13

Issue

10

Start / End Page

1236 / 1243

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Viscera
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Radiation Dosage
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Male
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
  • Image Enhancement
  • Humans