Comparison of experimental and computed values for j(NO2 )
Publication
, Journal Article
Stedman, DH; Chameides, W; Jackson, JO
Published in: Geophysical Research Letters
January 1, 1975
A comparison is made between two independent measurements and calculated values of j (NO2), the photolysis frequency of NO2. The calculated value was approximately 2% greater than the frequency implied by observations. This discrepancy is small enough to confirm the general accuracy of the computational technique and its associated input parameters. Copyright 1975 by the American Geophysical Union.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Geophysical Research Letters
DOI
EISSN
1944-8007
ISSN
0094-8276
Publication Date
January 1, 1975
Volume
2
Issue
1
Start / End Page
22 / 25
Related Subject Headings
- Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Stedman, D. H., Chameides, W., & Jackson, J. O. (1975). Comparison of experimental and computed values for j(NO2 ). Geophysical Research Letters, 2(1), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL002i001p00022
Stedman, D. H., W. Chameides, and J. O. Jackson. “Comparison of experimental and computed values for j(NO2 ).” Geophysical Research Letters 2, no. 1 (January 1, 1975): 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL002i001p00022.
Stedman DH, Chameides W, Jackson JO. Comparison of experimental and computed values for j(NO2 ). Geophysical Research Letters. 1975 Jan 1;2(1):22–5.
Stedman, D. H., et al. “Comparison of experimental and computed values for j(NO2 ).” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 1975, pp. 22–25. Scopus, doi:10.1029/GL002i001p00022.
Stedman DH, Chameides W, Jackson JO. Comparison of experimental and computed values for j(NO2 ). Geophysical Research Letters. 1975 Jan 1;2(1):22–25.
Published In
Geophysical Research Letters
DOI
EISSN
1944-8007
ISSN
0094-8276
Publication Date
January 1, 1975
Volume
2
Issue
1
Start / End Page
22 / 25
Related Subject Headings
- Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences