Skip to main content
release_alert
Welcome to the new Scholars 3.0! Read about new features and let us know what you think.
cancel
Journal cover image

Biopsychological markers of distress in informal caregivers.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Davis, LL; Weaver, M; Zamrini, E; Stevens, A; Kang, D; Parker Jr, CR
Published in: Biological Research for Nursing
October 2004

BACKGROUND: Thirty caregiving wives participated in a study of caregiving distress and negative mood (depressive symptoms) by making diary entries on stressful caregiving situations and collecting saliva samples 4 times a day. At the end of the 7-day study period, caregivers' salivary cortisol production was compared with their diary entries and correlated with pencil and paper self-report scores of caregiver distress and depressive symptoms. FINDINGS: Despite the inability to control a number of factors thought to confound cortisol production (exercise, smoking, alcohol ingestion, and prescription medications), there was a statistically significant difference between No Caregiving and Caregiving cortisol, F(1,739) = 7.67, P = 0.006, with cortisol production higher when caregiving events occurred. However, efforts to code specific types of caregiving situations (e.g., 1 = indirect care; 4 = AD problem behavior care) did not further differentiate cortisol production. Although caregivers' self-reports for the same 7-day period indicated they were depressed, pencil-and-paper measures of distress and negative affect were not significantly correlated with cortisol production. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The finding that this caregiving group was significantly stressed by caregiving, as evidenced by increased cortisol production during caregiving episodes, verifies the importance of further exploration of specific caregiving situations as contributory factors in caregiver health and well-being. In that saliva is a relatively economical and comparatively noninvasive biological data source for community-based stress studies, methodological limitations of the study are identified and 5 recommendations are made for future biological marker studies of caregiver distress in community-based settings.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Biological Research for Nursing

DOI

ISSN

1099-8004

Publication Date

October 2004

Volume

6

Issue

2

Start / End Page

90 / 99

Related Subject Headings

  • Nursing
  • 1110 Nursing
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Davis, L. L., Weaver, M., Zamrini, E., Stevens, A., Kang, D., & Parker Jr, C. R. (2004). Biopsychological markers of distress in informal caregivers. Biological Research for Nursing, 6(2), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800404267353
Davis, L. L., M. Weaver, E. Zamrini, A. Stevens, D. Kang, and C. R. Parker Jr. “Biopsychological markers of distress in informal caregivers.Biological Research for Nursing 6, no. 2 (October 2004): 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099800404267353.
Davis LL, Weaver M, Zamrini E, Stevens A, Kang D, Parker Jr CR. Biopsychological markers of distress in informal caregivers. Biological Research for Nursing. 2004 Oct;6(2):90–9.
Davis, L. L., et al. “Biopsychological markers of distress in informal caregivers.Biological Research for Nursing, vol. 6, no. 2, Oct. 2004, pp. 90–99. Manual, doi:10.1177/1099800404267353.
Davis LL, Weaver M, Zamrini E, Stevens A, Kang D, Parker Jr CR. Biopsychological markers of distress in informal caregivers. Biological Research for Nursing. 2004 Oct;6(2):90–99.
Journal cover image

Published In

Biological Research for Nursing

DOI

ISSN

1099-8004

Publication Date

October 2004

Volume

6

Issue

2

Start / End Page

90 / 99

Related Subject Headings

  • Nursing
  • 1110 Nursing