Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Comparison of real and idealized cetacean flippers.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Weber, PW; Murray, MM; Howle, LE; Fish, FE
Published in: Bioinspiration & biomimetics
December 2009

When a phenomenon in nature is mimicked for practical applications, it is often done so in an idealized fashion, such as representing the shape found in nature with convenient, piece-wise smooth mathematical functions. The aim of idealization is to capture the advantageous features of the natural phenomenon without having to exactly replicate it, and it is often assumed that the idealization process does in fact capture the relevant geometry. We explored the consequences of the idealization process by creating exact scale models of cetacean flippers using CT scans, creating corresponding idealized versions and then determining the hydrodynamic characteristics of the models via water tunnel testing. We found that the majority of the idealized models did not exhibit fluid dynamic properties that were drastically different from those of the real models, although multiple consequences resulting from the idealization process were evident. Drag performance was significantly improved by idealization. Overall, idealization is an excellent way to capture the relevant effects of a phenomenon found in nature, which spares the researcher from having to painstakingly create exact models, although we have found that there are situations where idealization may have unintended consequences such as one model that exhibited a decrease in lift performance.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Bioinspiration & biomimetics

DOI

EISSN

1748-3190

ISSN

1748-3182

Publication Date

December 2009

Volume

4

Issue

4

Start / End Page

046001

Related Subject Headings

  • Swimming
  • Rheology
  • Physiology
  • Models, Biological
  • Extremities
  • Equipment Failure Analysis
  • Equipment Design
  • Computer Simulation
  • Cetacea
  • Biomimetic Materials
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Weber, P. W., Murray, M. M., Howle, L. E., & Fish, F. E. (2009). Comparison of real and idealized cetacean flippers. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, 4(4), 046001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/4/4/046001
Weber, P. W., M. M. Murray, L. E. Howle, and F. E. Fish. “Comparison of real and idealized cetacean flippers.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 4, no. 4 (December 2009): 046001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3182/4/4/046001.
Weber PW, Murray MM, Howle LE, Fish FE. Comparison of real and idealized cetacean flippers. Bioinspiration & biomimetics. 2009 Dec;4(4):046001.
Weber, P. W., et al. “Comparison of real and idealized cetacean flippers.Bioinspiration & Biomimetics, vol. 4, no. 4, Dec. 2009, p. 046001. Epmc, doi:10.1088/1748-3182/4/4/046001.
Weber PW, Murray MM, Howle LE, Fish FE. Comparison of real and idealized cetacean flippers. Bioinspiration & biomimetics. 2009 Dec;4(4):046001.
Journal cover image

Published In

Bioinspiration & biomimetics

DOI

EISSN

1748-3190

ISSN

1748-3182

Publication Date

December 2009

Volume

4

Issue

4

Start / End Page

046001

Related Subject Headings

  • Swimming
  • Rheology
  • Physiology
  • Models, Biological
  • Extremities
  • Equipment Failure Analysis
  • Equipment Design
  • Computer Simulation
  • Cetacea
  • Biomimetic Materials