Skip to main content
Journal cover image

The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Cundiff, GW; Amundsen, CL; Bent, AE; Coates, KW; Schaffer, JI; Strohbehn, K; Handa, VL
Published in: Am J Obstet Gynecol
April 2007

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized crossover trial was to compare symptom relief and change in life impact for women using the ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries. STUDY DESIGN: Subjects were randomized to use each pessary for 3 months. Outcome data included a visual analog satisfaction score, and quality of life questionnaires. Analysis included student's t-test, Wilcoxan Signed-rank test and logistical regression. RESULTS: Subjects were primarily white, parous, postmenopausal women with a mean age of 61. The median POPQ stage was III. We enrolled 134 subjects and collected 3-month data on 94 ring and 99 Gellhorn subjects. There were statistically and clinically significant improvements in the majority of the PFDI and many PFIQ scales with both pessaries, but no clinically significant differences between the two pessaries. CONCLUSIONS: The ring with support and Gellhorn pessaries are effective and equivalent in relieving symptoms of protrusion and voiding dysfunction.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

Publication Date

April 2007

Volume

196

Issue

4

Start / End Page

405.e1 / 405.e8

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Risk Assessment
  • Quality of Life
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Probability
  • Pessaries
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Cundiff, G. W., Amundsen, C. L., Bent, A. E., Coates, K. W., Schaffer, J. I., Strohbehn, K., & Handa, V. L. (2007). The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 196(4), 405.e1-405.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.018
Cundiff, Geoffrey W., Cindy L. Amundsen, Alfred E. Bent, Kimberly W. Coates, Joseph I. Schaffer, Kris Strohbehn, and Victoria L. Handa. “The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries.Am J Obstet Gynecol 196, no. 4 (April 2007): 405.e1-405.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.018.
Cundiff GW, Amundsen CL, Bent AE, Coates KW, Schaffer JI, Strohbehn K, et al. The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):405.e1-405.e8.
Cundiff, Geoffrey W., et al. “The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries.Am J Obstet Gynecol, vol. 196, no. 4, Apr. 2007, pp. 405.e1-405.e8. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2007.02.018.
Cundiff GW, Amundsen CL, Bent AE, Coates KW, Schaffer JI, Strohbehn K, Handa VL. The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;196(4):405.e1-405.e8.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Obstet Gynecol

DOI

EISSN

1097-6868

Publication Date

April 2007

Volume

196

Issue

4

Start / End Page

405.e1 / 405.e8

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Uterine Prolapse
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Sickness Impact Profile
  • Risk Assessment
  • Quality of Life
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Probability
  • Pessaries
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Middle Aged