Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Lee, JH; Rehder, KJ; Williford, L; Cheifetz, IM; Turner, DA
Published in: Intensive Care Med
February 2013

BACKGROUND: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) systems utilize higher gas flow rates than standard nasal cannulae. The use of HFNC as a respiratory support modality is increasing in the infant, pediatric, and adult populations as an alternative to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation. OBJECTIVES: This critical review aims to: (1) appraise available evidence with regard to the utility of HFNC in neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients; (2) review the physiology of HFNC; (3) describe available HFNC systems (online supplement); and (4) review ongoing and planned trials studying the utility of HFNC in various clinical settings. RESULTS: Clinical neonatal studies are limited to premature infants. Only a few pediatric studies have examined the use of HFNC, with most focusing on this modality for viral bronchiolitis. In critically ill adults, most studies have focused on acute respiratory parameters and short-term physiologic outcomes with limited investigations focusing on clinical outcomes such as duration of therapy and need for escalation of ventilatory support. Current evidence demonstrates that HFNC generates positive airway pressure in most circumstances; however, the predominant mechanism of action in relieving respiratory distress is not well established. CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that HFNC is well tolerated and may be feasible in a subset of patients who require ventilatory support with non-invasive ventilation. However, HFNC has not been demonstrated to be equivalent or superior to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, and further studies are needed to identify clinical indications for HFNC in patients with moderate to severe respiratory distress.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Intensive Care Med

DOI

EISSN

1432-1238

Publication Date

February 2013

Volume

39

Issue

2

Start / End Page

247 / 257

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nose
  • Noninvasive Ventilation
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
  • Critical Illness
  • Child
  • Catheters
  • Adult
  • 3202 Clinical sciences
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Lee, J. H., Rehder, K. J., Williford, L., Cheifetz, I. M., & Turner, D. A. (2013). Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature. Intensive Care Med, 39(2), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2743-5
Lee, Jan Hau, Kyle J. Rehder, Lee Williford, Ira M. Cheifetz, and David A. Turner. “Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature.Intensive Care Med 39, no. 2 (February 2013): 247–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-012-2743-5.
Lee JH, Rehder KJ, Williford L, Cheifetz IM, Turner DA. Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):247–57.
Lee, Jan Hau, et al. “Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature.Intensive Care Med, vol. 39, no. 2, Feb. 2013, pp. 247–57. Pubmed, doi:10.1007/s00134-012-2743-5.
Lee JH, Rehder KJ, Williford L, Cheifetz IM, Turner DA. Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):247–257.
Journal cover image

Published In

Intensive Care Med

DOI

EISSN

1432-1238

Publication Date

February 2013

Volume

39

Issue

2

Start / End Page

247 / 257

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Nose
  • Noninvasive Ventilation
  • Infant
  • Humans
  • Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
  • Critical Illness
  • Child
  • Catheters
  • Adult
  • 3202 Clinical sciences