Gatekeepers and keymasters: Dynamic relationships of access in geographical fieldwork
This article contributes to a recent and growing body of literature exploring the nature of fieldwork in human geography. Specifically, we critically examine the role of gatekeepers in providing access to "the field," based on existing conceptualizations of gatekeepers in the literature and on our own experiences with gatekeepers. We argue that the concept of gatekeepers has been oversimplified, in that relationships between researchers and gatekeepers are often assumed to be unidirectional - with gatekeepers controlling or providing access by researchers - and predominantly static in form and time. Although we accept the necessity and advantages of working through gatekeepers, our experiences suggest that relationships with them are highly complex and evolve over time, with sometimes unexpected implications for research. In gathering and analyzing data, researchers become gatekeepers themselves, what we are calling "keymasters." Reconceptualizing the gatekeeper researcher relationship will contribute to ongoing efforts to more fully understand field-workers as undertaking a practice inherently political, personal, and linked to the production of knowledge. Copyright © 2006 by the American Geographical Society of New York.
Duke Scholars
Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats
Published In
DOI
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Geography
- 4406 Human geography
- 3709 Physical geography and environmental geoscience
- 1604 Human Geography
- 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience
Citation
Published In
DOI
ISSN
Publication Date
Volume
Issue
Start / End Page
Related Subject Headings
- Geography
- 4406 Human geography
- 3709 Physical geography and environmental geoscience
- 1604 Human Geography
- 0406 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience