Formally modeling a gender-segregated economy: A reply to Campbell and Warner
Publication
, Journal Article
Darity Jr, WA
Published in: World Development
1997
Campbell and Warner contend that there are two major problems with my presentation of a formal structure for analysis of a gender-segregated low-income economy in an earlier issue of this journal. Their first argument that there is no explicit treatment of women negotiating their wage is unimportant. Their second argument is correct; my construction of the male's decision-making process is underspecified, precluding an internal maximization solution. Two options for formalization are advanced that make an internal maximization solution feasible. © 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Duke Scholars
Published In
World Development
Publication Date
1997
Volume
25
Issue
12
Start / End Page
2159 / 2161
Related Subject Headings
- Development Studies
- 16 Studies in Human Society
- 14 Economics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Darity Jr, W. A. (1997). Formally modeling a gender-segregated economy: A reply to Campbell and Warner. World Development, 25(12), 2159–2161.
Darity Jr, W. A. “Formally modeling a gender-segregated economy: A reply to Campbell and Warner.” World Development 25, no. 12 (1997): 2159–61.
Darity Jr WA. Formally modeling a gender-segregated economy: A reply to Campbell and Warner. World Development. 1997;25(12):2159–61.
Darity Jr, W. A. “Formally modeling a gender-segregated economy: A reply to Campbell and Warner.” World Development, vol. 25, no. 12, 1997, pp. 2159–61.
Darity Jr WA. Formally modeling a gender-segregated economy: A reply to Campbell and Warner. World Development. 1997;25(12):2159–2161.
Published In
World Development
Publication Date
1997
Volume
25
Issue
12
Start / End Page
2159 / 2161
Related Subject Headings
- Development Studies
- 16 Studies in Human Society
- 14 Economics