Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Finkelstein, EA; Zhen, C; Bilger, M; Nonnemaker, J; Farooqui, AM; Todd, JE
Published in: J Health Econ
January 2013

Using the 2006 Homescan panel, we estimate the changes in energy, fat and sodium purchases resulting from a tax that increases the price of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) by 20% and the effect of such a tax on body weight. In addition to substitutions that may arise with other beverages, we account for substitutions between SSBs and 12 major food categories. Our main findings are that the tax would result in a decrease in store-bought energy of 24.3kcal per day per person, which would translate into an average weight loss of 1.6 pounds during the first year and a cumulated weight loss of 2.9 pounds in the long run. We do not find evidence of substitution to sugary foods and show that complementary foods could contribute to decreasing energy purchases. Despite their significantly lower price elasticity, the tax has a similar effect on calories for the largest purchasers of SSBs.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Health Econ

DOI

EISSN

1879-1646

Publication Date

January 2013

Volume

32

Issue

1

Start / End Page

219 / 239

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Taxes
  • Obesity
  • Models, Economic
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Food
  • Feeding Behavior
  • Carbonated Beverages
  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 3801 Applied economics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Finkelstein, E. A., Zhen, C., Bilger, M., Nonnemaker, J., Farooqui, A. M., & Todd, J. E. (2013). Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered. J Health Econ, 32(1), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.005
Finkelstein, Eric A., Chen Zhen, Marcel Bilger, James Nonnemaker, Assad M. Farooqui, and Jessica E. Todd. “Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered.J Health Econ 32, no. 1 (January 2013): 219–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.005.
Finkelstein EA, Zhen C, Bilger M, Nonnemaker J, Farooqui AM, Todd JE. Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered. J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):219–39.
Finkelstein, Eric A., et al. “Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered.J Health Econ, vol. 32, no. 1, Jan. 2013, pp. 219–39. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.005.
Finkelstein EA, Zhen C, Bilger M, Nonnemaker J, Farooqui AM, Todd JE. Implications of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) tax when substitutions to non-beverage items are considered. J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):219–239.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Health Econ

DOI

EISSN

1879-1646

Publication Date

January 2013

Volume

32

Issue

1

Start / End Page

219 / 239

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Taxes
  • Obesity
  • Models, Economic
  • Humans
  • Health Policy & Services
  • Food
  • Feeding Behavior
  • Carbonated Beverages
  • 4407 Policy and administration
  • 3801 Applied economics