Commentary on Drs Miettinen and Henschke's viewpoint
Publication
, Journal Article
Patz, J; Black, WC; Goodman, PC
Published in: Radiology
January 1, 2001
We should first verify that this form of screening is indeed effective and that its benefits outweigh its harms.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Radiology
DOI
ISSN
0033-8419
Publication Date
January 1, 2001
Volume
221
Issue
3
Start / End Page
597
Related Subject Headings
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Patz, J., Black, W. C., & Goodman, P. C. (2001). Commentary on Drs Miettinen and Henschke's viewpoint. Radiology, 221(3), 597. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2213010618
Patz, J., W. C. Black, and P. C. Goodman. “Commentary on Drs Miettinen and Henschke's viewpoint.” Radiology 221, no. 3 (January 1, 2001): 597. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2213010618.
Patz J, Black WC, Goodman PC. Commentary on Drs Miettinen and Henschke's viewpoint. Radiology. 2001 Jan 1;221(3):597.
Patz, J., et al. “Commentary on Drs Miettinen and Henschke's viewpoint.” Radiology, vol. 221, no. 3, Jan. 2001, p. 597. Scopus, doi:10.1148/radiol.2213010618.
Patz J, Black WC, Goodman PC. Commentary on Drs Miettinen and Henschke's viewpoint. Radiology. 2001 Jan 1;221(3):597.
Published In
Radiology
DOI
ISSN
0033-8419
Publication Date
January 1, 2001
Volume
221
Issue
3
Start / End Page
597
Related Subject Headings
- Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
- 3202 Clinical sciences
- 11 Medical and Health Sciences