Skip to main content

Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Somma, KA; Bhatt, DL; Fonarow, GC; Cannon, CP; Cox, M; Laskey, W; Peacock, WF; Hernandez, AF; Peterson, ED; Schwamm, L; Saxon, LA
Published in: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
September 1, 2012

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend similar medical therapy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the Get with the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease registry (GWTG-CAD), we analyzed data including 72 352 patients (48 966, NSTEMI; 23 386, STEMI) from 237 US sites between May 1, 2006 and March 21, 2010. Performance and quality measures were compared between NSTEMI and STEMI patients. NSTEMI patients were older and had a higher rate of medical comorbidities compared with STEMI patients, including prior coronary artery disease (38.5% versus 24.7%; P<0.0001), heart failure (17.5% versus 6.2%; P<0.0001), hypertension (70.8% versus 59.1%; P<0.0001) and diabetes mellitus (34.9 versus 23.3%; P<0.0001). Adjusting for confounding variables, STEMI patients were more likely to receive aspirin within 24 hours 98.5% versus 97.1% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.02), be discharged on aspirin 98.5% versus 97.3% (AOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19-1.49), β-blockers 98.2% versus 96.9% (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.35-1.63), or lipid-lowering medication for low-density lipoprotein level >100 mg/dL 96.8% versus 91.0% (AOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.61-2.13). STEMI patients were also more likely to receive β-blockers within 24 hours of hospital arrival 93.9% versus 90.8% (AOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.37-1.79) and the following discharge medications: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocking agents 85.3% versus 77.4% (AOR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.51-1.75), clopidogrel 85.6% versus 67.0% (AOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 2.23-2.61) or lipid-lowering medications 94.8% versus 88.0% (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.56-1.86). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitals participating in GWTG-CAD, adherence with guideline-based medical therapy was high for patients with both STEMI and NSTEMI. Yet, there is still room for further improvement, particularly in the care of NSTEMI patients.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

September 1, 2012

Volume

5

Issue

5

Start / End Page

654 / 661

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Registries
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Odds Ratio
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Somma, K. A., Bhatt, D. L., Fonarow, G. C., Cannon, C. P., Cox, M., Laskey, W., … Saxon, L. A. (2012). Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, 5(5), 654–661. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963959
Somma, Keith A., Deepak L. Bhatt, Gregg C. Fonarow, Christopher P. Cannon, Margueritte Cox, Warren Laskey, W Frank Peacock, et al. “Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 5, no. 5 (September 1, 2012): 654–61. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963959.
Somma KA, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, Cox M, Laskey W, et al. Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):654–61.
Somma, Keith A., et al. “Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, vol. 5, no. 5, Sept. 2012, pp. 654–61. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.963959.
Somma KA, Bhatt DL, Fonarow GC, Cannon CP, Cox M, Laskey W, Peacock WF, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm L, Saxon LA. Guideline adherence after ST-segment elevation versus non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):654–661.

Published In

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

DOI

EISSN

1941-7705

Publication Date

September 1, 2012

Volume

5

Issue

5

Start / End Page

654 / 661

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Time Factors
  • Risk Factors
  • Risk Assessment
  • Registries
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Odds Ratio