Sawaya, G. F., McConnell, K. J., Kulasingam, S. L., Lawson, H. W., Kerlikowske, K., Melnikow, J., … Duarte-Franco, E. F. (2004). Screening every three years, instead of annually, would result in a small increase in risk of cervical cancer. Evidence-Based Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6(4), 204–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebobgyn.2004.09.009

Sawaya, G. F., K. J. McConnell, S. L. Kulasingam, H. W. Lawson, K. Kerlikowske, J. Melnikow, N. C. Lee, et al. “Screening every three years, instead of annually, would result in a small increase in risk of cervical cancer.” Evidence-Based Obstetrics and Gynecology 6, no. 4 (December 1, 2004): 204–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebobgyn.2004.09.009.

Sawaya GF, McConnell KJ, Kulasingam SL, Lawson HW, Kerlikowske K, Melnikow J, et al. Screening every three years, instead of annually, would result in a small increase in risk of cervical cancer. Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004 Dec 1;6(4):204–5.

Sawaya, G. F., et al. “Screening every three years, instead of annually, would result in a small increase in risk of cervical cancer.” Evidence-Based Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 6, no. 4, Dec. 2004, pp. 204–05. Scopus, doi:10.1016/j.ebobgyn.2004.09.009.

Sawaya GF, McConnell KJ, Kulasingam SL, Lawson HW, Kerlikowske K, Melnikow J, Lee NC, Gildengorin G, Myers ER, Washington AE, Franco EL, Duarte-Franco EF. Screening every three years, instead of annually, would result in a small increase in risk of cervical cancer. Evidence-based Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004 Dec 1;6(4):204–205.