How should the minimum important difference for a health-related quality-of-life instrument be estimated?
Publication
, Journal Article
Samsa, G
Published in: Med Care
October 2001
Duke Scholars
Published In
Med Care
DOI
ISSN
0025-7079
Publication Date
October 2001
Volume
39
Issue
10
Start / End Page
1037 / 1038
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Research Design
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Quality of Life
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Humans
- Health Policy & Services
- 4407 Policy and administration
- 4203 Health services and systems
- 3801 Applied economics
- 1402 Applied Economics
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Samsa, G. (2001). How should the minimum important difference for a health-related quality-of-life instrument be estimated? Med Care, 39(10), 1037–1038. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200110000-00001
Samsa, G. “How should the minimum important difference for a health-related quality-of-life instrument be estimated?” Med Care 39, no. 10 (October 2001): 1037–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200110000-00001.
Samsa G. How should the minimum important difference for a health-related quality-of-life instrument be estimated? Med Care. 2001 Oct;39(10):1037–8.
Samsa, G. “How should the minimum important difference for a health-related quality-of-life instrument be estimated?” Med Care, vol. 39, no. 10, Oct. 2001, pp. 1037–38. Pubmed, doi:10.1097/00005650-200110000-00001.
Samsa G. How should the minimum important difference for a health-related quality-of-life instrument be estimated? Med Care. 2001 Oct;39(10):1037–1038.
Published In
Med Care
DOI
ISSN
0025-7079
Publication Date
October 2001
Volume
39
Issue
10
Start / End Page
1037 / 1038
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Research Design
- Quality-Adjusted Life Years
- Quality of Life
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care
- Humans
- Health Policy & Services
- 4407 Policy and administration
- 4203 Health services and systems
- 3801 Applied economics
- 1402 Applied Economics