Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Auerbach, AD; Sanders, GD; Hambleton, J
Published in: Am J Med
June 15, 2004

PURPOSE: Among patients with deep vein thrombosis, hypercoagulable conditions impart a substantial risk of recurrent thrombosis. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of testing for these disorders, as well as which tests should be selected and how results should be used. METHODS: Using a Markov state-transition model, strategies of testing or not testing for a hypercoagulable state followed by anticoagulation for 6 to 36 months were compared in a hypothetical cohort of patients with apparently idiopathic deep vein thrombosis who were followed for life. Strategies were compared based on lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and marginal cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: In the base case, testing followed by 24 months of anticoagulation in patients with a hypercoagulable condition was more cost-effective ($54,820; 23.76 QALYs) than usual care, which comprised 6 months of anticoagulation without testing ($55,260; 23.72 QALYs). All hypercoagulable conditions tested were common enough and associated with a sufficient risk of recurrence to justify inclusion in a test panel. Twenty-four months of initial anticoagulation was preferred (<$50,000/QALY) for most conditions, whereas lifetime anticoagulation was preferred for patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome ($2928/QALY) or homozygous factor V Leiden mutation ($3804/QALY). Models using newer evidence on recurrence suggested 18 to 36 months of anticoagulation without testing as the preferred approach. CONCLUSION: Testing for hypercoagulable disorders in patients with idiopathic deep vein thrombosis followed by 2 years of anticoagulation in affected patients is cost-effective. A simpler approach of treating all patients with prolonged anticoagulation without testing is justified if data confirm the persistent risk of recurrent thrombosis.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

ISSN

0002-9343

Publication Date

June 15, 2004

Volume

116

Issue

12

Start / End Page

816 / 828

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Venous Thrombosis
  • Thrombophilia
  • Recurrence
  • Quality of Life
  • Middle Aged
  • Markov Chains
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Auerbach, A. D., Sanders, G. D., & Hambleton, J. (2004). Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Am J Med, 116(12), 816–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.017
Auerbach, Andrew D., Gillian D. Sanders, and Julie Hambleton. “Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis.Am J Med 116, no. 12 (June 15, 2004): 816–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.017.
Auerbach, Andrew D., et al. “Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis.Am J Med, vol. 116, no. 12, June 2004, pp. 816–28. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.017.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

ISSN

0002-9343

Publication Date

June 15, 2004

Volume

116

Issue

12

Start / End Page

816 / 828

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Venous Thrombosis
  • Thrombophilia
  • Recurrence
  • Quality of Life
  • Middle Aged
  • Markov Chains
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Aged