Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Auerbach, AD; Sanders, GD; Hambleton, J
Published in: Am J Med
June 15, 2004

PURPOSE: Among patients with deep vein thrombosis, hypercoagulable conditions impart a substantial risk of recurrent thrombosis. We sought to determine the cost-effectiveness of testing for these disorders, as well as which tests should be selected and how results should be used. METHODS: Using a Markov state-transition model, strategies of testing or not testing for a hypercoagulable state followed by anticoagulation for 6 to 36 months were compared in a hypothetical cohort of patients with apparently idiopathic deep vein thrombosis who were followed for life. Strategies were compared based on lifetime costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and marginal cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: In the base case, testing followed by 24 months of anticoagulation in patients with a hypercoagulable condition was more cost-effective ($54,820; 23.76 QALYs) than usual care, which comprised 6 months of anticoagulation without testing ($55,260; 23.72 QALYs). All hypercoagulable conditions tested were common enough and associated with a sufficient risk of recurrence to justify inclusion in a test panel. Twenty-four months of initial anticoagulation was preferred (<$50,000/QALY) for most conditions, whereas lifetime anticoagulation was preferred for patients with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome ($2928/QALY) or homozygous factor V Leiden mutation ($3804/QALY). Models using newer evidence on recurrence suggested 18 to 36 months of anticoagulation without testing as the preferred approach. CONCLUSION: Testing for hypercoagulable disorders in patients with idiopathic deep vein thrombosis followed by 2 years of anticoagulation in affected patients is cost-effective. A simpler approach of treating all patients with prolonged anticoagulation without testing is justified if data confirm the persistent risk of recurrent thrombosis.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

ISSN

0002-9343

Publication Date

June 15, 2004

Volume

116

Issue

12

Start / End Page

816 / 828

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Venous Thrombosis
  • Thrombophilia
  • Recurrence
  • Quality of Life
  • Middle Aged
  • Markov Chains
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Aged
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Auerbach, A. D., Sanders, G. D., & Hambleton, J. (2004). Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis. Am J Med, 116(12), 816–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.017
Auerbach, Andrew D., Gillian D. Sanders, and Julie Hambleton. “Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis.Am J Med 116, no. 12 (June 15, 2004): 816–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.017.
Auerbach, Andrew D., et al. “Cost-effectiveness of testing for hypercoagulability and effects on treatment strategies in patients with deep vein thrombosis.Am J Med, vol. 116, no. 12, June 2004, pp. 816–28. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.017.
Journal cover image

Published In

Am J Med

DOI

ISSN

0002-9343

Publication Date

June 15, 2004

Volume

116

Issue

12

Start / End Page

816 / 828

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Venous Thrombosis
  • Thrombophilia
  • Recurrence
  • Quality of Life
  • Middle Aged
  • Markov Chains
  • Humans
  • General & Internal Medicine
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Aged