Index fundamentalism revisited
Publication
, Journal Article
Reinker, KS; Tower, E
Published in: Journal of Portfolio Management
January 1, 2004
Is there any justification for investing in managed mutual funds, or are they only for chumps, as indexing advocates argue? The authors answer the question by looking at 27 years of real fund returns for Vanguard, a company notable for its low fees on managed funds. Analysis of synthetic portfolios based on the assets of Vanguard's mutual funds indicates that whether index funds or managed funds are the superior buy depends on the time span in question, but managed funds almost always have a lower standard deviation of return than index funds.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Journal of Portfolio Management
DOI
ISSN
0095-4918
Publication Date
January 1, 2004
Volume
30
Issue
4
Start / End Page
4 / 50
Related Subject Headings
- Finance
- 3502 Banking, finance and investment
- 1502 Banking, Finance and Investment
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Reinker, K. S., & Tower, E. (2004). Index fundamentalism revisited. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(4), 4–50. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2004.37
Reinker, K. S., and E. Tower. “Index fundamentalism revisited.” Journal of Portfolio Management 30, no. 4 (January 1, 2004): 4–50. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2004.37.
Reinker KS, Tower E. Index fundamentalism revisited. Journal of Portfolio Management. 2004 Jan 1;30(4):4–50.
Reinker, K. S., and E. Tower. “Index fundamentalism revisited.” Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 30, no. 4, Jan. 2004, pp. 4–50. Scopus, doi:10.3905/jpm.2004.37.
Reinker KS, Tower E. Index fundamentalism revisited. Journal of Portfolio Management. 2004 Jan 1;30(4):4–50.
Published In
Journal of Portfolio Management
DOI
ISSN
0095-4918
Publication Date
January 1, 2004
Volume
30
Issue
4
Start / End Page
4 / 50
Related Subject Headings
- Finance
- 3502 Banking, finance and investment
- 1502 Banking, Finance and Investment