Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Dillard, AJ; Fagerlin, A; Dal Cin, S; Zikmund-Fisher, BJ; Ubel, PA
Published in: Social science & medicine (1982)
July 2010

Narratives from similar others may be an effective way to increase important health behaviors. In this study, we used a narrative intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening. Researchers have suggested that people may overestimate barriers to colorectal cancer screening. We recruited participants from the US, ages 49-60 who had never previously been screened for colorectal cancer, to read an educational message about screening for the disease. One-half of participants were randomly assigned to also receive a narrative within the message (control participants did not receive a narrative). The narrative intervention was developed according to predictions of affective forecasting theory. Compared to participants who received only the educational message, participants who received the message along with a narrative reported that the barriers to screening would have less of an impact on a future screening experience. The narrative also increased risk perception for colorectal cancer and interest in screening in the next year.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Social science & medicine (1982)

DOI

EISSN

1873-5347

ISSN

0277-9536

Publication Date

July 2010

Volume

71

Issue

1

Start / End Page

45 / 52

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Risk Assessment
  • Public Health
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Narration
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Health Promotion
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Dillard, A. J., Fagerlin, A., Dal Cin, S., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2010). Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 71(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038
Dillard, Amanda J., Angela Fagerlin, Sonya Dal Cin, Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher, and Peter A. Ubel. “Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Social Science & Medicine (1982) 71, no. 1 (July 2010): 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038.
Dillard AJ, Fagerlin A, Dal Cin S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Social science & medicine (1982). 2010 Jul;71(1):45–52.
Dillard, Amanda J., et al. “Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening.Social Science & Medicine (1982), vol. 71, no. 1, July 2010, pp. 45–52. Epmc, doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.038.
Dillard AJ, Fagerlin A, Dal Cin S, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA. Narratives that address affective forecasting errors reduce perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening. Social science & medicine (1982). 2010 Jul;71(1):45–52.
Journal cover image

Published In

Social science & medicine (1982)

DOI

EISSN

1873-5347

ISSN

0277-9536

Publication Date

July 2010

Volume

71

Issue

1

Start / End Page

45 / 52

Related Subject Headings

  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Risk Assessment
  • Public Health
  • Patient Acceptance of Health Care
  • Narration
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Humans
  • Health Services Accessibility
  • Health Promotion