Reconstructing the past: A response to four readers
Publication
, Journal Article
Weintraub, ER
Published in: Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
June 1, 2003
In this paper, the author of How Economics Became a Mathematical Science (Duke University Press, 2002) responds to four papers (from Paul Davidson, Sheila Dow, Donald Katzner, and J. Barkley Rosser Jr.) written for a symposium on his book. In addition to specific responses to points raised by the readers, the author argues, for economists, the historical commonplace that there can be no privileged perspective from which to view the past; there is no right way to write history, only more or less interesting ways.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
ISSN
0160-3477
Publication Date
June 1, 2003
Volume
25
Issue
4
Start / End Page
591 / 598
Related Subject Headings
- Economics
- 3803 Economic theory
- 3801 Applied economics
- 1401 Economic Theory
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Weintraub, E. R. (2003). Reconstructing the past: A response to four readers. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 25(4), 591–598.
Weintraub, E. R. “Reconstructing the past: A response to four readers.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 25, no. 4 (June 1, 2003): 591–98.
Weintraub ER. Reconstructing the past: A response to four readers. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2003 Jun 1;25(4):591–8.
Weintraub, E. R. “Reconstructing the past: A response to four readers.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 25, no. 4, June 2003, pp. 591–98.
Weintraub ER. Reconstructing the past: A response to four readers. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 2003 Jun 1;25(4):591–598.
Published In
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics
ISSN
0160-3477
Publication Date
June 1, 2003
Volume
25
Issue
4
Start / End Page
591 / 598
Related Subject Headings
- Economics
- 3803 Economic theory
- 3801 Applied economics
- 1401 Economic Theory