Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Marrs, R; Meldrum, D; Muasher, S; Schoolcraft, W; Werlin, L; Kelly, E
Published in: Reprod Biomed Online
February 2004

Women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for male factor infertility were randomly assigned to receive ovarian stimulation in a long agonist protocol with a combination of recombinant human FSH (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) and recombinant human LH (r-hLH; Luveris) (n = 212) starting on day 6 of FSH stimulation until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) at a daily fixed dose of 150 IU r-hLH, or with r-hFSH alone (n = 219). There was no significant difference in the number of metaphase II oocytes retrieved (10.3 versus 10.4) in patients treated with r-hFSH and r-hLH versus r-hFSH alone; however, more embryos were transferred in the LH-supplemented group (2.9 versus 2.8, P = 0.037). Overall, the implantation rates were 22.9 versus 27.0% in patients treated with r-hFSH and r-hLH versus with r-hFSH alone respectively (NS). The respective numbers of MII oocytes retrieved in patients <35 or >or=35 years were 11 versus 8.3 (P = 0.010) for patients treated with r-hFSH alone, and 10.7 versus 9.3 (NS) for those given supplemental r-hLH (150 IU) from day 6. Implantation rates in patients <35 years treated with r-hFSH were higher (30.7%) than those receiving r-hFSH and r-hLH, (23.5%) (P = 0.068). In patients >or=35 years, the implantation rates were 21.7% for those patients supplemented with 150 IU r-hLH from day 6 of stimulation versus 15.7% when treated with FSH alone (NS). Younger patients therefore do not seem to benefit from an LH-supplemented ovarian stimulation protocol, but women >or=35 years undergoing assisted reproduction may benefit from using r-hLH in addition to r-hFSH.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Reprod Biomed Online

DOI

ISSN

1472-6483

Publication Date

February 2004

Volume

8

Issue

2

Start / End Page

175 / 182

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
  • Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Ovary
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Male
  • Luteinizing Hormone
  • Humans
  • Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Marrs, R., Meldrum, D., Muasher, S., Schoolcraft, W., Werlin, L., & Kelly, E. (2004). Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment. Reprod Biomed Online, 8(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60513-5
Marrs, R., D. Meldrum, S. Muasher, W. Schoolcraft, L. Werlin, and E. Kelly. “Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment.Reprod Biomed Online 8, no. 2 (February 2004): 175–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60513-5.
Marrs, R., et al. “Randomized trial to compare the effect of recombinant human FSH (follitropin alfa) with or without recombinant human LH in women undergoing assisted reproduction treatment.Reprod Biomed Online, vol. 8, no. 2, Feb. 2004, pp. 175–82. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60513-5.
Journal cover image

Published In

Reprod Biomed Online

DOI

ISSN

1472-6483

Publication Date

February 2004

Volume

8

Issue

2

Start / End Page

175 / 182

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic
  • Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
  • Pregnancy Outcome
  • Pregnancy
  • Ovary
  • Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
  • Male
  • Luteinizing Hormone
  • Humans
  • Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human