Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Nonscientist participation in the peer review process: is it desirable? Is it implementable? Who are the nonscientists who should become involved? A panel discussion.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Schwarcz, SL; Brown, T; Greenbaum, LM; Kayden, HJ; Trumbull, R
Published in: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
January 1981

Duke Scholars

Published In

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

DOI

EISSN

1749-6632

ISSN

0077-8923

Publication Date

January 1981

Volume

368

Start / End Page

213 / 228

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Science
  • Research Support as Topic
  • Peer Review
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • General Science & Technology
  • Ethics, Professional
  • Community Participation
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Schwarcz, S. L., Brown, T., Greenbaum, L. M., Kayden, H. J., & Trumbull, R. (1981). Nonscientist participation in the peer review process: is it desirable? Is it implementable? Who are the nonscientists who should become involved? A panel discussion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 368, 213–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb15450.x
Schwarcz, S. L., T. Brown, L. M. Greenbaum, H. J. Kayden, and R. Trumbull. “Nonscientist participation in the peer review process: is it desirable? Is it implementable? Who are the nonscientists who should become involved? A panel discussion.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 368 (January 1981): 213–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb15450.x.
Schwarcz SL, Brown T, Greenbaum LM, Kayden HJ, Trumbull R. Nonscientist participation in the peer review process: is it desirable? Is it implementable? Who are the nonscientists who should become involved? A panel discussion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1981 Jan;368:213–28.
Schwarcz, S. L., et al. “Nonscientist participation in the peer review process: is it desirable? Is it implementable? Who are the nonscientists who should become involved? A panel discussion.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 368, Jan. 1981, pp. 213–28. Epmc, doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb15450.x.
Schwarcz SL, Brown T, Greenbaum LM, Kayden HJ, Trumbull R. Nonscientist participation in the peer review process: is it desirable? Is it implementable? Who are the nonscientists who should become involved? A panel discussion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1981 Jan;368:213–228.
Journal cover image

Published In

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

DOI

EISSN

1749-6632

ISSN

0077-8923

Publication Date

January 1981

Volume

368

Start / End Page

213 / 228

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Science
  • Research Support as Topic
  • Peer Review
  • Interprofessional Relations
  • General Science & Technology
  • Ethics, Professional
  • Community Participation