Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Methacholine-induced cutaneous flare response: bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Buckley, CE; Lee, KL; Burdick, DS
Published in: J Allergy Clin Immunol
January 1982

Cutaneous reactions to allergens exhibit a sigmoid dose-response relationship. Available methods for evaluating the allergen skin-test response do not adequately account for the sigmoid curve. Methodologic factors handicap quantitative studies of allergens based on skin-test reactivity. This problem was evaluated with a pharmacologic agonist that mimics cutaneous reactivity. Epicutaneous tests with appropriate concentrations of methacholine were used to provoke flare responses in 84 healthy subjects. A novel hyperbolic tangent model of the sigmoid dose-response curve was used to estimate responsiveness (R) as the midpoint of the sigmoid curve. Sensitivity (C) was estimated as the agonist concentration yielding a flare response equivalent to R. Estimates of sensitivity were independent of estimates of responsiveness (r=-0.0565, p=0.6642). The geometric mean methacholine sensitivity among health subjects was 287 mM/L, and average methacholine responsiveness was 4.9 mm. The mathematic model used in these studies fitted observations surprisingly well (X2(84)=37.044, p greater than 0.95). Differences in methacholine sensitivity and responsiveness related to race, sex, and allergic and/or vasomotor tendencies were detected but were subtle and did not account for a significant portion of the variation among healthy subjects. This model may provide a useful method for quantifying cutaneous immediate hypersensitivity reactions in patients.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Allergy Clin Immunol

DOI

ISSN

0091-6749

Publication Date

January 1982

Volume

69

Issue

1 Pt 1

Start / End Page

25 / 34

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • Skin Tests
  • Sex Factors
  • Models, Biological
  • Methacholine Compounds
  • Male
  • Hypersensitivity, Immediate
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Humans
  • Female
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Buckley, C. E., Lee, K. L., & Burdick, D. S. (1982). Methacholine-induced cutaneous flare response: bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 69(1 Pt 1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(82)90083-5
Buckley, C. E., K. L. Lee, and D. S. Burdick. “Methacholine-induced cutaneous flare response: bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity.J Allergy Clin Immunol 69, no. 1 Pt 1 (January 1982): 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(82)90083-5.
Buckley CE, Lee KL, Burdick DS. Methacholine-induced cutaneous flare response: bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Jan;69(1 Pt 1):25–34.
Buckley, C. E., et al. “Methacholine-induced cutaneous flare response: bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity.J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol. 69, no. 1 Pt 1, Jan. 1982, pp. 25–34. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/0091-6749(82)90083-5.
Buckley CE, Lee KL, Burdick DS. Methacholine-induced cutaneous flare response: bivariate analysis of responsiveness and sensitivity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982 Jan;69(1 Pt 1):25–34.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Allergy Clin Immunol

DOI

ISSN

0091-6749

Publication Date

January 1982

Volume

69

Issue

1 Pt 1

Start / End Page

25 / 34

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • White People
  • Skin Tests
  • Sex Factors
  • Models, Biological
  • Methacholine Compounds
  • Male
  • Hypersensitivity, Immediate
  • Hypersensitivity
  • Humans
  • Female