WHY THE 1ST-AMENDMENT SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE - A RESPONSE
Publication
, Journal Article
CHRISTIE, GC
Published in: DUKE LAW JOURNAL
September 1, 1986
Duke Scholars
Published In
DUKE LAW JOURNAL
ISSN
0012-7086
Publication Date
September 1, 1986
Issue
4
Start / End Page
683 / 695
Publisher
DUKE UNIV
Related Subject Headings
- Law
- 48 Law and legal studies
- 1801 Law
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
CHRISTIE, G. C. (1986). WHY THE 1ST-AMENDMENT SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE - A RESPONSE. DUKE LAW JOURNAL, (4), 683–695.
CHRISTIE, G. C. “WHY THE 1ST-AMENDMENT SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE - A RESPONSE.” DUKE LAW JOURNAL, no. 4 (September 1, 1986): 683–95.
CHRISTIE GC. WHY THE 1ST-AMENDMENT SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE - A RESPONSE. DUKE LAW JOURNAL. 1986 Sep 1;(4):683–95.
CHRISTIE, G. C. “WHY THE 1ST-AMENDMENT SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE - A RESPONSE.” DUKE LAW JOURNAL, no. 4, DUKE UNIV, Sept. 1986, pp. 683–95.
CHRISTIE GC. WHY THE 1ST-AMENDMENT SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED FROM THE PATHOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE - A RESPONSE. DUKE LAW JOURNAL. DUKE UNIV; 1986 Sep 1;(4):683–695.
Published In
DUKE LAW JOURNAL
ISSN
0012-7086
Publication Date
September 1, 1986
Issue
4
Start / End Page
683 / 695
Publisher
DUKE UNIV
Related Subject Headings
- Law
- 48 Law and legal studies
- 1801 Law