Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read.
Publication
, Journal Article
Krishnan, KRR
Published in: Psychopharmacol Bull
2003
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis are affected by the studies that are included or excluded. A number of biases are common including excluding unpublished data, non English language publications, and non indexed articles. In addition there can be a differential impact based on the quality and comparability of studies. In this article we review the potential significance of these biases.
Duke Scholars
Published In
Psychopharmacol Bull
ISSN
0048-5764
Publication Date
2003
Volume
37
Issue
4
Start / End Page
88 / 91
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Publishing
- Psychiatry
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Citation
APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Krishnan, K. R. R. (2003). Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read. Psychopharmacol Bull, 37(4), 88–91.
Krishnan, K Ranga Rama. “Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read.” Psychopharmacol Bull 37, no. 4 (2003): 88–91.
Krishnan KRR. Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2003;37(4):88–91.
Krishnan, K. Ranga Rama. “Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read.” Psychopharmacol Bull, vol. 37, no. 4, 2003, pp. 88–91.
Krishnan KRR. Evidence-based practice: how to evaluate what you read. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2003;37(4):88–91.
Published In
Psychopharmacol Bull
ISSN
0048-5764
Publication Date
2003
Volume
37
Issue
4
Start / End Page
88 / 91
Location
United States
Related Subject Headings
- Publishing
- Psychiatry
- Evidence-Based Medicine