Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Implications of alternative agricultural productivity growth assumptions on land management, greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigation potential

Publication ,  Journal Article
Baker, JS; Murray, BC; Mccarl, BA; Feng, S; Johansson, R
Published in: American Journal of Agricultural Economics
January 1, 2013

Future productivity growth in agriculture is necessary to satisfy rising food, fiber and bio-energy demands, and to contribute to global environmental objectives, including greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation. Conventional logic suggests that improved productivity per-unit area can spare additional agricultural land expansion, intensification on existing cropland, and land degradation. For example, higher net returns under status quo practices could lead to local intensification and land clearing if the localized yield improvements dominate any decline in market price that results from collective productivity improvements shifting out market supply. Alternative productivity growth scenarios were developed for this study based on historical observations of yield growth. Specifically, researchers estimated productivity growth parameters for all major US agricultural commodities across different time periods, then extrapolated future yields across several distinct scenarios. The agricultural sector depicts production possibilities for 40 primary crop commodities, 25 livestock commodities, and more than 50 processed goods.

Duke Scholars

Published In

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

DOI

EISSN

1467-8276

ISSN

0002-9092

Publication Date

January 1, 2013

Volume

95

Issue

2

Start / End Page

435 / 441

Related Subject Headings

  • Agricultural Economics & Policy
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 1402 Applied Economics
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Baker, J. S., Murray, B. C., Mccarl, B. A., Feng, S., & Johansson, R. (2013). Implications of alternative agricultural productivity growth assumptions on land management, greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigation potential. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas114
Baker, J. S., B. C. Murray, B. A. Mccarl, S. Feng, and R. Johansson. “Implications of alternative agricultural productivity growth assumptions on land management, greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigation potential.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95, no. 2 (January 1, 2013): 435–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aas114.
Baker JS, Murray BC, Mccarl BA, Feng S, Johansson R. Implications of alternative agricultural productivity growth assumptions on land management, greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigation potential. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2013 Jan 1;95(2):435–41.
Baker, J. S., et al. “Implications of alternative agricultural productivity growth assumptions on land management, greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigation potential.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 95, no. 2, Jan. 2013, pp. 435–41. Scopus, doi:10.1093/ajae/aas114.
Baker JS, Murray BC, Mccarl BA, Feng S, Johansson R. Implications of alternative agricultural productivity growth assumptions on land management, greenhouse gas emissions, and mitigation potential. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2013 Jan 1;95(2):435–441.
Journal cover image

Published In

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

DOI

EISSN

1467-8276

ISSN

0002-9092

Publication Date

January 1, 2013

Volume

95

Issue

2

Start / End Page

435 / 441

Related Subject Headings

  • Agricultural Economics & Policy
  • 3801 Applied economics
  • 1402 Applied Economics