## The sensitivity of compressed sensing performance to relaxation of sparsity

Many papers studying compressed sensing consider the noisy underdetermined system of linear equations: y = Ax 0+ z, with n x N measurement matrix A, n < N, and Gaussian white noise z ∼ N(0,σ 2 I). Both y and A are known, both x 0 and z are unknown, and we seek an approximation to x 0; we let δ = n/N ∈ (0,1) denote the undersampling fraction. In the popular strict sparsity model of compressed sensing, such papers further assume that x 0 has at most a specified fraction ε of nonzeros. In this paper, we relax the assumption of strict sparsity by assuming the vector x 0 is close in mean p-th power to a sparse signal. We study how this relaxation affects the performance of ℓ 1-penalized ℓ 2 minimization, in which the reconstruction x̂ 1,λ solves min min ∥y - A x∥ 22/2 + λ∥x∥ 1. We study asymptotic mean-squared error (AMSE), the large-system limit of the MSE of x 1, λ. Using recently developed tools based on Approximate Message Passing (AMP), we develop expressions for minimax AMSE M* ε, p(δ, ξ, σ) - max over all approximately sparse signals, min over penalizations λ, where ξ measures the deviation from strict sparsity. There is of course a phase transition curve δ* = δ*(ε); only above this curve, δ > δ*(ε), can we have exact recovery even in the noiseless-data strict-sparsity setting. It turns out that the minimax AMSE can be characterized succinctly by a coefficient sens* p(ε, δ) which we refer to as the sparsity-relaxation sensitivity. We give explicit expressions for sens* p(ε, δ), compute them, and interpret them. Our approach yields precise formulas in place of loose order bounds based on restricted isometry property and instance optimality results. Our formulas reveal that sensitivity is finite everywhere exact recovery is possible under strict sparsity, and that sensitivity to added random noise in the measurements y is smaller than the sensitivity to adding a comparable amount of noise to the estimand x 0. Our methods can also treat the mean q-th power loss. The methods themselves are based on minimax decision theory and seem of independent interest. © 2012 IEEE.

### Duke Scholars

## Published In

## DOI

## Publication Date

## Start / End Page

### Citation

*Ieee International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings*, 2211–2215. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2012.6283846

*Ieee International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings*, October 22, 2012, 2211–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIT.2012.6283846.

*Ieee International Symposium on Information Theory Proceedings*, Oct. 2012, pp. 2211–15.

*Scopus*, doi:10.1109/ISIT.2012.6283846.