Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Evidence for impacts of nonindigenous macroalgae: A meta-analysis of experimental field studies1

Publication ,  Journal Article
Thomsen, MS; Wernberg, T; Tuya, F; Silliman, BR
Published in: Journal of Phycology
August 1, 2009

Invasions by nonindigenous macroalgal species (NIMS) potentially cause severe impacts on native species. We conducted a meta-analysis of 18 field-based manipulative experiments to quantify the direction and magnitude of impacts (Hedges effect size d, hereafter ES). We found significant small-to-medium negative effects on "macrophyte abundance" (cover, biomass of native taxa; EScumulative = -0.30) and medium-to-large negative effects on "macrophyte assemblages" (richness, diversity, total abundance; EScumulative = -0.70). In contrast, EScumulative were not significant for "macrophyte processes" (growth, mortality; ES cumulative = -0.39), "animal abundance" (densities; ES cumulative = -0.13), or "animal assemblages" (richness, diversity; EScumulative = 0.75). The nonsignificant effect sizes were characterized by low sample sizes and should be interpreted with caution. Three study-specific effect sizes were particularly large (<-2.0), showing that, in specific cases, impacts can be highly negative. From a conservation perspective, focus could be on such worst-case scenarios. Still, the reported EScumulative are likely biased toward larger effects because only the most conspicuous NIMS have been tested and because nonsignificant results are less likely to be published. To better understand the impacts of NIMS, more manipulative experiments are needed, testing more species and under contrasting environmental conditions. Future studies should include procedural control treatments and report the abundance of the NIMS to avoid ambiguous interpretations. In conclusion, current experimental evidence shows that NIMS have, on average, small-to-large negative impacts on native plant species and assemblages. It is possible that these effects can result in severe consequences when accumulated over long time periods and large spatial scales. © 2009 Phycological Society of America.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Journal of Phycology

DOI

EISSN

1529-8817

ISSN

0022-3646

Publication Date

August 1, 2009

Volume

45

Issue

4

Start / End Page

812 / 819

Related Subject Headings

  • Marine Biology & Hydrobiology
  • 3108 Plant biology
  • 3005 Fisheries sciences
  • 0704 Fisheries Sciences
  • 0607 Plant Biology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Thomsen, M. S., Wernberg, T., Tuya, F., & Silliman, B. R. (2009). Evidence for impacts of nonindigenous macroalgae: A meta-analysis of experimental field studies1. Journal of Phycology, 45(4), 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00709.x
Thomsen, M. S., T. Wernberg, F. Tuya, and B. R. Silliman. “Evidence for impacts of nonindigenous macroalgae: A meta-analysis of experimental field studies1.” Journal of Phycology 45, no. 4 (August 1, 2009): 812–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00709.x.
Thomsen MS, Wernberg T, Tuya F, Silliman BR. Evidence for impacts of nonindigenous macroalgae: A meta-analysis of experimental field studies1. Journal of Phycology. 2009 Aug 1;45(4):812–9.
Thomsen, M. S., et al. “Evidence for impacts of nonindigenous macroalgae: A meta-analysis of experimental field studies1.” Journal of Phycology, vol. 45, no. 4, Aug. 2009, pp. 812–19. Scopus, doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00709.x.
Thomsen MS, Wernberg T, Tuya F, Silliman BR. Evidence for impacts of nonindigenous macroalgae: A meta-analysis of experimental field studies1. Journal of Phycology. 2009 Aug 1;45(4):812–819.
Journal cover image

Published In

Journal of Phycology

DOI

EISSN

1529-8817

ISSN

0022-3646

Publication Date

August 1, 2009

Volume

45

Issue

4

Start / End Page

812 / 819

Related Subject Headings

  • Marine Biology & Hydrobiology
  • 3108 Plant biology
  • 3005 Fisheries sciences
  • 0704 Fisheries Sciences
  • 0607 Plant Biology