Skip to main content
Journal cover image

A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Resick, PA; Bovin, MJ; Calloway, AL; Dick, AM; King, MW; Mitchell, KS; Suvak, MK; Wells, SY; Stirman, SW; Wolf, EJ
Published in: J Trauma Stress
June 2012

Complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD) has been proposed as a diagnosis for capturing the diverse clusters of symptoms observed in survivors of prolonged trauma that are outside the current definition of PTSD. Introducing a new diagnosis requires a high standard of evidence, including a clear definition of the disorder, reliable and valid assessment measures, support for convergent and discriminant validity, and incremental validity with respect to implications for treatment planning and outcome. In this article, the extant literature on CPTSD is reviewed within the framework of construct validity to evaluate the proposed diagnosis on these criteria. Although the efforts in support of CPTSD have brought much needed attention to limitations in the trauma literature, we conclude that available evidence does not support a new diagnostic category at this time. Some directions for future research are suggested.

Duke Scholars

Published In

J Trauma Stress

DOI

EISSN

1573-6598

Publication Date

June 2012

Volume

25

Issue

3

Start / End Page

241 / 251

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Psychiatry
  • Humans
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • 5203 Clinical and health psychology
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 5201 Applied and developmental psychology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Resick, P. A., Bovin, M. J., Calloway, A. L., Dick, A. M., King, M. W., Mitchell, K. S., … Wolf, E. J. (2012). A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5. J Trauma Stress, 25(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21699
Resick, Patricia A., Michelle J. Bovin, Amber L. Calloway, Alexandra M. Dick, Matthew W. King, Karen S. Mitchell, Michael K. Suvak, Stephanie Y. Wells, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman, and Erika J. Wolf. “A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5.J Trauma Stress 25, no. 3 (June 2012): 241–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.21699.
Resick PA, Bovin MJ, Calloway AL, Dick AM, King MW, Mitchell KS, et al. A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5. J Trauma Stress. 2012 Jun;25(3):241–51.
Resick, Patricia A., et al. “A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5.J Trauma Stress, vol. 25, no. 3, June 2012, pp. 241–51. Pubmed, doi:10.1002/jts.21699.
Resick PA, Bovin MJ, Calloway AL, Dick AM, King MW, Mitchell KS, Suvak MK, Wells SY, Stirman SW, Wolf EJ. A critical evaluation of the complex PTSD literature: implications for DSM-5. J Trauma Stress. 2012 Jun;25(3):241–251.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Trauma Stress

DOI

EISSN

1573-6598

Publication Date

June 2012

Volume

25

Issue

3

Start / End Page

241 / 251

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • United States
  • Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Psychiatry
  • Humans
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
  • 5203 Clinical and health psychology
  • 5202 Biological psychology
  • 5201 Applied and developmental psychology