Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Richards, AJ; Staats, J; Enzor, J; McKinnon, K; Frelinger, J; Denny, TN; Weinhold, KJ; Chan, C
Published in: J Immunol Methods
July 2014

The accurate identification of rare antigen-specific cytokine positive cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) after antigenic stimulation in an intracellular staining (ICS) flow cytometry assay is challenging, as cytokine positive events may be fairly diffusely distributed and lack an obvious separation from the negative population. Traditionally, the approach by flow operators has been to manually set a positivity threshold to partition events into cytokine-positive and cytokine-negative. This approach suffers from subjectivity and inconsistency across different flow operators. The use of statistical clustering methods does not remove the need to find an objective threshold between between positive and negative events since consistent identification of rare event subsets is highly challenging for automated algorithms, especially when there is distributional overlap between the positive and negative events ("smear"). We present a new approach, based on the Fβ measure, that is similar to manual thresholding in providing a hard cutoff, but has the advantage of being determined objectively. The performance of this algorithm is compared with results obtained by expert visual gating. Several ICS data sets from the External Quality Assurance Program Oversight Laboratory (EQAPOL) proficiency program were used to make the comparisons. We first show that visually determined thresholds are difficult to reproduce and pose a problem when comparing results across operators or laboratories, as well as problems that occur with the use of commonly employed clustering algorithms. In contrast, a single parameterization for the Fβ method performs consistently across different centers, samples, and instruments because it optimizes the precision/recall tradeoff by using both negative and positive controls.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

J Immunol Methods

DOI

EISSN

1872-7905

Publication Date

July 2014

Volume

409

Start / End Page

54 / 61

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Specimen Handling
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Control
  • Program Development
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Observer Variation
  • Monitoring, Immunologic
  • Leukocytes, Mononuclear
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Richards, A. J., Staats, J., Enzor, J., McKinnon, K., Frelinger, J., Denny, T. N., … Chan, C. (2014). Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods, 409, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.002
Richards, Adam J., Janet Staats, Jennifer Enzor, Katherine McKinnon, Jacob Frelinger, Thomas N. Denny, Kent J. Weinhold, and Cliburn Chan. “Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry.J Immunol Methods 409 (July 2014): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.002.
Richards AJ, Staats J, Enzor J, McKinnon K, Frelinger J, Denny TN, et al. Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jul;409:54–61.
Richards, Adam J., et al. “Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry.J Immunol Methods, vol. 409, July 2014, pp. 54–61. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.jim.2014.04.002.
Richards AJ, Staats J, Enzor J, McKinnon K, Frelinger J, Denny TN, Weinhold KJ, Chan C. Setting objective thresholds for rare event detection in flow cytometry. J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jul;409:54–61.
Journal cover image

Published In

J Immunol Methods

DOI

EISSN

1872-7905

Publication Date

July 2014

Volume

409

Start / End Page

54 / 61

Location

Netherlands

Related Subject Headings

  • Specimen Handling
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care
  • Quality Control
  • Program Development
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Observer Variation
  • Monitoring, Immunologic
  • Leukocytes, Mononuclear