Skip to main content

Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Jones, WS; Baumgartner, I; Hiatt, WR; Heizer, G; Conte, MS; White, CJ; Berger, JS; Held, P; Katona, BG; Mahaffey, KW; Norgren, L; Blomster, J ...
Published in: Circulation
January 17, 2017

BACKGROUND: In patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease with a history of limb revascularization, the optimal antithrombotic regimen for long-term management is unknown. METHODS: The EUCLID trial (Examining Use of Ticagrelor In PAD) randomized 13 885 patients with peripheral artery disease to treatment with ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Patients were enrolled based on an abnormal ankle-brachial index ≤0.80 or a previous lower extremity revascularization. This analysis focuses on the 7875 (57%) patients enrolled based on the previous lower extremity revascularization criterion. Patients could not be enrolled within 30 days of most recent revascularization, and patients with an indication for dual antiplatelet therapy were excluded. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. The primary safety end point was major bleeding. RESULTS: Patients with a previous revascularization had a mean age of 66 years, 73% were male, and the median baseline ankle-brachial index was 0.78. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients enrolled based on previous revascularization had similar rates of the primary composite end point (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.23, P=0.12) and statistically significantly higher rates of myocardial infarction (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.08-1.55, P=0.005) and acute limb ischemia (HR 4.23, 95% CI 2.86-6.25, P<0.001) when compared with patients enrolled based on ankle-brachial index criteria. No differences in ticagrelor- versus clopidogrel-treated patients were found for the primary efficacy end point (11.4% vs 11.3%; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88-1.15; P=0.90), all-cause mortality (9.2% vs 9.2%; HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86-1.15; P=0.93), acute limb ischemia (2.5% vs 2.5%; HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78-1.36; P=0.84), or major bleeding (1.9% vs 1.8%; HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.83-1.59; P=0.41). The median duration of follow-up was ≈30 months. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for baseline characteristics, patients enrolled based on previous revascularization for peripheral artery disease had higher rates of myocardial infarction and acute limb ischemia, with similar composite rates of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke when compared with patients enrolled based on the ankle-brachial index criterion. No significant differences were found between ticagrelor and clopidogrel for reduction of cardiovascular or acute limb events. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01732822.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

January 17, 2017

Volume

135

Issue

3

Start / End Page

241 / 250

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticlopidine
  • Ticagrelor
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
  • Male
  • Lower Extremity
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Clopidogrel
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Jones, W. S., Baumgartner, I., Hiatt, W. R., Heizer, G., Conte, M. S., White, C. J., … International Steering Committee and Investigators of the EUCLID Trial, . (2017). Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease. Circulation, 135(3), 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025880
Jones, W Schuyler, Iris Baumgartner, William R. Hiatt, Gretchen Heizer, Michael S. Conte, Christopher J. White, Jeffrey S. Berger, et al. “Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease.Circulation 135, no. 3 (January 17, 2017): 241–50. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025880.
Jones WS, Baumgartner I, Hiatt WR, Heizer G, Conte MS, White CJ, et al. Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease. Circulation. 2017 Jan 17;135(3):241–50.
Jones, W. Schuyler, et al. “Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease.Circulation, vol. 135, no. 3, Jan. 2017, pp. 241–50. Pubmed, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025880.
Jones WS, Baumgartner I, Hiatt WR, Heizer G, Conte MS, White CJ, Berger JS, Held P, Katona BG, Mahaffey KW, Norgren L, Blomster J, Millegård M, Reist C, Patel MR, Fowkes FGR, International Steering Committee and Investigators of the EUCLID Trial. Ticagrelor Compared With Clopidogrel in Patients With Prior Lower Extremity Revascularization for Peripheral Artery Disease. Circulation. 2017 Jan 17;135(3):241–250.

Published In

Circulation

DOI

EISSN

1524-4539

Publication Date

January 17, 2017

Volume

135

Issue

3

Start / End Page

241 / 250

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ticlopidine
  • Ticagrelor
  • Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease
  • Male
  • Lower Extremity
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Clopidogrel