APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Network (APOLLO): Design and Rationale.

Journal Article (Journal Article)

INTRODUCTION: Much of the higher risk for end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in African American individuals relates to ancestry-specific variation in the apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1). Relative to kidneys from European American deceased-donors, kidneys from African American deceased-donors have shorter allograft survival and African American living-kidney donors more often develop ESKD. The National Institutes of Health (NIH)-sponsored APOL1 Long-term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Network (APOLLO) is prospectively assessing kidney allograft survival from donors with recent African ancestry based on donor and recipient APOL1 genotypes. METHODS: APOLLO will evaluate outcomes from 2614 deceased kidney donor-recipient pairs, as well as additional living-kidney donor-recipient pairs and unpaired deceased-donor kidneys. RESULTS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), Association of Organ Procurement Organizations, American Society of Transplantation, American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, and nearly all U.S. kidney transplant programs, organ procurement organizations (OPOs), and histocompatibility laboratories are participating in this observational study. APOLLO employs a central institutional review board (cIRB) and maintains voluntary partnerships with OPOs and histocompatibility laboratories. A Community Advisory Council composed of African American individuals with a personal or family history of kidney disease has advised the NIH Project Office and Steering Committee since inception. UNOS is providing data for outcome analyses. CONCLUSION: This article describes unique aspects of the protocol, design, and performance of APOLLO. Results will guide use of APOL1 genotypic data to improve the assessment of quality in deceased-donor kidneys and could increase numbers of transplanted kidneys, reduce rates of discard, and improve the safety of living-kidney donation.

Full Text

Duke Authors

Cited Authors

  • Freedman, BI; Moxey-Mims, MM; Alexander, AA; Astor, BC; Birdwell, KA; Bowden, DW; Bowen, G; Bromberg, J; Craven, TE; Dadhania, DM; Divers, J; Doshi, MD; Eidbo, E; Fornoni, A; Gautreaux, MD; Gbadegesin, RA; Gee, PO; Guerra, G; Hsu, C-Y; Iltis, AS; Jefferson, N; Julian, BA; Klassen, DK; Koty, PP; Langefeld, CD; Lentine, KL; Ma, L; Mannon, RB; Menon, MC; Mohan, S; Moore, JB; Murphy, B; Newell, KA; Odim, J; Ortigosa-Goggins, M; Palmer, ND; Park, M; Parsa, A; Pastan, SO; Poggio, ED; Rajapakse, N; Reeves-Daniel, AM; Rosas, SE; Russell, LP; Sawinski, D; Smith, SC; Spainhour, M; Stratta, RJ; Weir, MR; Reboussin, DM; Kimmel, PL; Brennan, DC

Published Date

  • March 2020

Published In

Volume / Issue

  • 5 / 3

Start / End Page

  • 278 - 288

PubMed ID

  • 32154449

Pubmed Central ID

  • PMC7056919

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 2468-0249

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

  • 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.11.022


  • eng

Conference Location

  • United States