Skip to main content
Journal cover image

Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing "PARP inhibitors-for-all" to the biomarker-directed use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Gonzalez, R; Havrilesky, LJ; Myers, ER; Secord, AA; Dottino, JA; Berchuck, A; Moss, HA
Published in: Gynecol Oncol
November 2020

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials evaluating universal PARP inhibitor (PARPi) frontline maintenance therapy for advanced stage ovarian cancer have reported progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. It is unclear whether PARPi maintenance therapy will universally enhance value (clinical benefits relative to cost of delivery). We compared a "PARPi-for-all" to a biomarker-directed frontline maintenance therapy approach as a value-based care strategy. METHODS: The cost of two frontline PARPi maintenance strategies, PARPi-for-all and biomarker-directed maintenance, was compared using modified Markov decision models simulating the study designs of the PRIMA, VELIA, and, PAOLA-1 trials. Outcomes of interest included overall costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported in US dollars per quality adjusted progression-free life-year (QA-PFY) gained. RESULTS: PARPi-for-all was more costly and provided greater PFS benefit than a biomarker-directed strategy for each trial. The mean cost per patient for the PARPi-for-all strategy was $166,269, $286,715, and $366,506 for the PRIMA, VELIA, and PAOLA-1 models, respectively. For the biomarker-directed strategy, the mean cost per patient was $98,188, $167,334, and $260,671 for the PRIMA, VELIA, and PAOLA-1 models. ICERs of PARPi-for-all compared to biomarker-directed maintenance were: $593,250/QA-PFY (PRIMA), $1,512,495/QA-PFY (VELIA), and $3,347,915/QA-PFY (PAOLA-1). At current drug pricing, there is no PFS improvement in a biomarker negative cohort that would make PARPi-for-all cost-effective compared to biomarker-directed maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high costs of universal PARPi maintenance treatment, compared with a biomarker-directed PARPi strategy. Maintenance therapy in the front-line setting should be reserved for those with germline or somatic HRD mutations until the cost of therapy is significantly reduced.

Duke Scholars

Altmetric Attention Stats
Dimensions Citation Stats

Published In

Gynecol Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1095-6859

Publication Date

November 2020

Volume

159

Issue

2

Start / End Page

483 / 490

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Maintenance Chemotherapy
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Gonzalez, R., Havrilesky, L. J., Myers, E. R., Secord, A. A., Dottino, J. A., Berchuck, A., & Moss, H. A. (2020). Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing "PARP inhibitors-for-all" to the biomarker-directed use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 159(2), 483–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.003
Gonzalez, Rafael, Laura J. Havrilesky, Evan R. Myers, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Joseph A. Dottino, Andrew Berchuck, and Haley A. Moss. “Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing "PARP inhibitors-for-all" to the biomarker-directed use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer.Gynecol Oncol 159, no. 2 (November 2020): 483–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.003.
Gonzalez, Rafael, et al. “Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing "PARP inhibitors-for-all" to the biomarker-directed use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer.Gynecol Oncol, vol. 159, no. 2, Nov. 2020, pp. 483–90. Pubmed, doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.003.
Gonzalez R, Havrilesky LJ, Myers ER, Secord AA, Dottino JA, Berchuck A, Moss HA. Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing "PARP inhibitors-for-all" to the biomarker-directed use of PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed advanced stage ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Nov;159(2):483–490.
Journal cover image

Published In

Gynecol Oncol

DOI

EISSN

1095-6859

Publication Date

November 2020

Volume

159

Issue

2

Start / End Page

483 / 490

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Progression-Free Survival
  • Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Oncology & Carcinogenesis
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Maintenance Chemotherapy
  • Humans
  • Female
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial