Skip to main content

Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Bilska-Wolak, AO; Floyd, CE; Nolte, LW; Lo, JY
Published in: Med Phys
May 2003

The likelihood ratio (LR) is an optimal approach for deciding which of two alternate hypotheses best describes a given situation. We adopted this formalism for predicting whether biopsy results of mammographic masses will be benign or malignant, aiming to reduce the number of biopsies performed on benign lesions. We compared the performance of this LR-based algorithm (LRb) to a case-based reasoning (CBR) classifier, which provides a solution to a new problem using past similiar cases. Each classifier used mammographers' BI-RADS descriptions of mammographic masses as input. The database consisted of 646 biopsy-proven mammography cases. Performance was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, Round Robin sampling, and bootstrap. The ROC areas (AUC) for the LRb and CBR were 0.91+/- 0.01 and 0.92 +/- 0.01, respectively. The partial ROC area index (0.90AUC) was the same for both classifiers, 0.59 +/- 0.05. At a sensitivity of 98%, the CBR would spare 204 (49%) of benign lesions from biopsy; the LRb would spare 209 (51%) benign lesions. The performance of the two classifiers was very similar, with no statistical differences in AUC or 0.90AUC. Although the CBR and LRb originate from different fields of study, their implementations differ only in the estimation of the probability density functions (PDFs) of the feature distributions. The CBR performs this estimation implicitly, while using various similarity metrics. On the other hand, the estimation of the PDFs is specified explicitly in the LRb implementation. This difference in the estimation of the PDFs results in the very small difference in performance, and at 98% sensitivity, both classifiers would spare about half of the benign mammographic masses from biopsy. The CBR and LRb are equivalent methods in implementation and performance.

Duke Scholars

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

May 2003

Volume

30

Issue

5

Start / End Page

949 / 958

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Pattern Recognition, Automated
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Mammography
  • Male
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Bilska-Wolak, A. O., Floyd, C. E., Nolte, L. W., & Lo, J. Y. (2003). Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning. Med Phys, 30(5), 949–958. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1565339
Bilska-Wolak, Anna O., Carey E. Floyd, Loren W. Nolte, and Joseph Y. Lo. “Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning.Med Phys 30, no. 5 (May 2003): 949–58. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1565339.
Bilska-Wolak, Anna O., et al. “Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning.Med Phys, vol. 30, no. 5, May 2003, pp. 949–58. Pubmed, doi:10.1118/1.1565339.

Published In

Med Phys

DOI

ISSN

0094-2405

Publication Date

May 2003

Volume

30

Issue

5

Start / End Page

949 / 958

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Young Adult
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Pattern Recognition, Automated
  • Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
  • Middle Aged
  • Mammography
  • Male
  • Likelihood Functions
  • Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted