Skip to main content

Critical appraisal of four IL-6 immunoassays.

Publication ,  Journal Article
Thompson, DK; Huffman, KM; Kraus, WE; Kraus, VB
Published in: PLoS One
2012

BACKGROUND: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) contributes to numerous inflammatory, metabolic, and physiologic pathways of disease. We evaluated four IL-6 immunoassays in order to identify a reliable assay for studies of metabolic and physical function. Serial plasma samples from intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs), with expected rises in IL-6 concentrations, were used to test the face validity of the various assays. METHODS AND FINDINGS: IVGTTs, administered to 14 subjects, were performed with a single infusion of glucose (0.3 g/kg body mass) at time zero, a single infusion of insulin (0.025 U/kg body mass) at 20 minutes, and frequent blood collection from time zero to 180 minutes for subsequent Il-6 measurement. The performance metrics of four IL-6 detection methods were compared: Meso Scale Discovery immunoassay (MSD), an Invitrogen Luminex bead-based multiplex panel (LX), an Invitrogen Ultrasensitive Luminex bead-based singleplex assay (ULX), and R&D High Sensitivity ELISA (R&D). IL-6 concentrations measured with MSD, R&D and ULX correlated with each other (Pearson Correlation Coefficients r = 0.47-0.94, p<0.0001) but only ULX correlated (r = 0.31, p = 0.0027) with Invitrogen Luminex. MSD, R&D, and ULX, but not LX, detected increases in IL-6 in response to glucose. All plasma samples were measurable by MSD, while 35%, 1%, and 4.3% of samples were out of range when measured by LX, ULX, and R&D, respectively. Based on representative data from the MSD assay, baseline plasma IL-6 (0.90 ± 0.48 pg/mL) increased significantly as expected by 90 minutes (1.29 ± 0.59 pg/mL, p = 0.049), and continued rising through 3 hours (4.25 ± 3.67 pg/mL, p = 0.0048). CONCLUSION: This study established the face validity of IL-6 measurement by MSD, R&D, and ULX but not LX, and the superiority of MSD with respect to dynamic range. Plasma IL-6 concentrations increase in response to glucose and insulin, consistent with both an early glucose-dependent response (detectable at 1-2 hours) and a late insulin-dependent response (detectable after 2 hours).

Duke Scholars

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2012

Volume

7

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e30659

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Kinetics
  • Interleukin-6
  • Insulin
  • Immunoassay
  • Humans
  • Glucose
  • General Science & Technology
 

Citation

APA
Chicago
ICMJE
MLA
NLM
Thompson, D. K., Huffman, K. M., Kraus, W. E., & Kraus, V. B. (2012). Critical appraisal of four IL-6 immunoassays. PLoS One, 7(2), e30659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030659
Thompson, Dana K., Kim M. Huffman, William E. Kraus, and Virginia Byers Kraus. “Critical appraisal of four IL-6 immunoassays.PLoS One 7, no. 2 (2012): e30659. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030659.
Thompson DK, Huffman KM, Kraus WE, Kraus VB. Critical appraisal of four IL-6 immunoassays. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30659.
Thompson, Dana K., et al. “Critical appraisal of four IL-6 immunoassays.PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 2, 2012, p. e30659. Pubmed, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030659.
Thompson DK, Huffman KM, Kraus WE, Kraus VB. Critical appraisal of four IL-6 immunoassays. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30659.

Published In

PLoS One

DOI

EISSN

1932-6203

Publication Date

2012

Volume

7

Issue

2

Start / End Page

e30659

Location

United States

Related Subject Headings

  • Time Factors
  • Kinetics
  • Interleukin-6
  • Insulin
  • Immunoassay
  • Humans
  • Glucose
  • General Science & Technology