Scholars@Duke

• Background
• 

  Education, Training, & Certifications

  • Ph.D., University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill 1974
  • M.A., University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill 1973
  • B.A., University of Florida 1970
• 

  Previous Appointments & Affiliations

  • Professor of Business Administration, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University 1996 - 2019
  • James L. Vincent Distinguished Professor of Leadership, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University 2008 - 2019
  • Thomas A. Finch Jr. Distinguished Professor of Business Administration, in the Fuqua School of Business, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University 1999 - 2008
  • Director of the Center for Excellence in Business Education, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University 2001 - 2002
• Recognition
• 

  Awards & Honors

  • Fellow. Association for Psychological Science. 2013
  • William A. Owens Scholarly Achievement Award. Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 2002
  • Harry J. Kalven, Jr. Prize. Law and Society Association. 2000
• Expertise
• 

  Global Scholarship

  • Research

    • China (Country) 
    • France (Country) 
    • Germany (Country) 
    • Japan (Country) 
    • Netherlands (Country) 

  • Teaching

    • New Zealand (Country) 
• Research
• 

  Selected Grants

  • Making Sense of Health Information Technology in an Academic Medical Center awarded by Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2011 - 2012
  • Environmental Justice: Process, Experience and Acceptance of Policy from an Environmental Dispute Resolution Process awarded by  National Science Foundation 1999 - 2002
  • Legal Authority in a Diverse Society: The Psychology of Cross-Ethnic Authority awarded by  National Science Foundation 1996 - 1998
• Publications & Artistic Works
• 

  Selected Publications

  • Books

    • Lind, E. A. Social conflict and social justice: Some lessons from the social psychology of justice. Leiden University Press, 1995.
    • Lind, E. A., and T. R. Tyler. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.

  • Academic Articles

    • Hulst, L., K. van den Bos, A. J. Akkermans, and E. A. Lind. “On why procedural justice matters in court hearings: Experimental evidence that behavioral disinhibition weakens the association between procedural justice and evaluations of judges.” Utrecht Law Review 13, no. 3 (January 1, 2017): 114–29. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.413.
       Full Text
    • Bos, Kees van den, E. A. Lind, Jeroen Bommelé, and Sebastian D. J. VandeVondele. “Reminders of behavioral disinhibition increase public conformity in the Asch paradigm and behavioral affiliation with ingroup members.” Frontiers in Psychology 6 (January 2015): 837. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00837.
       Full Text
    • Pérez-Arechaederra, Diana, Elena Briones, Allan Lind, and Luis García-Ortiz. “Perceived Organizational Justice in Care Services: creation and multi-sample validation of a measure.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 102 (February 2014): 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.045.
       Full Text
    • Bos, K. van den, L. van der Velden, and E. A. Lind. “On the role of perceived procedural justice in citizens' reactions to government decisions and the handling of conflicts.” Utrecht Law Review 10, no. 4 (January 1, 2014): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.287.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., and K. van den Bos. “Freeing organizational behavior from inhibitory constraints.” Research in Organizational Behavior 33 (November 6, 2013): 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2013.10.001.
       Full Text
    • Kitzmiller, Rebecca R., Reuben R. McDaniel, Constance M. Johnson, E Allan Lind, and Ruth A. Anderson. “Exploring interpersonal behavior and team sensemaking during health information technology implementation.” Advances in Health Care Management 14 (January 2013): 119–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-8231(2013)00000140010.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., and K. van den Bos. “Freeing organizational behavior from inhibitory constraints.” Research in Organizational Behavior, 2013.
    • Van den Bos, K., and E. A. Lind. “On Sense-Making Reactions and Public Inhibition of Benign Social Motives. An Appraisal Model of Prosocial Behavior.” 48 (January 1, 2013): 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407188-9.00001-6.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A. “The missed promotion: An exercise demonstrating the importance of organizational justice.” Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal 26, no. 1 (December 30, 2011): 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlo.2012.08126aaa.008.
       Full Text
    • Bos, Kees van den, Paul A. M. Van Lange, E Allan Lind, Leonie A. Venhoeven, Dagmar A. Beudeker, Florien M. Cramwinckel, Linda Smulders, and Jorien van der Laan. “On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: because of the prosocial nature of people, behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 101, no. 4 (October 2011): 791–811. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023556.
       Full Text
    • Caza, A., B. B. Caza, and E. A. Lind. “The missed promotion: An exercise demonstrating the importance of organizational justice.” Journal of Management Education 35, no. 4 (August 1, 2011): 537–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562910381875.
       Full Text
    • Tost, L. P., and E. A. Lind. “Chapter 1: Sounding the alarm: Moving from system justification to system condemnation in the justice judgment process.” Research on Managing Groups and Teams 13 (December 1, 2010): 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-0856(2010)0000013004.
       Full Text
    • Pérez-Arechaederra, Diana, Carmen Herrero, Allan Lind, and Jaume Masip. “Exploration of fairness in health services: a qualitative analysis.” Health Marketing Quarterly 27, no. 3 (July 2010): 244–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/07359683.2010.495299.
       Full Text
    • Janson, A., L. Levy, S. B. Sitkin, and E. A. Lind. “Fairness and other leadership heuristics: A four-nation study.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 17, no. 2 (June 1, 2008): 251–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320701746510.
       Full Text
    • KOLB, D. G., P. D. COLLINS, and E. A. LIND. “Requisite Connectivity:. Finding Flow in a Not-So-Flat World.” Organizational Dynamics 37, no. 2 (April 1, 2008): 181–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.004.
       Full Text
    • Bos, K. van den, J. Ham, E. A. Lind, M. Simonis, W. J. van Essen, and M. Rijpkema. “Justice and the human alarm system: The impact of exclamation points and flashing lights on the justice judgment process.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44, no. 2 (March 1, 2008): 201–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.001.
       Full Text
    • Leung, Kwok, Kwok-Kit Tong, and E Allan Lind. “Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92, no. 3 (March 2007): 476–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.476.
       Full Text
    • Prooijen, J. W. van, K. van den Bos, E. A. Lind, and H. A. M. Wilke. “How do people react to negative procedures? On the moderating role of authority's biased attitudes.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42, no. 5 (September 1, 2006): 632–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.004.
       Full Text
    • Kray, Laura J., Leigh Thompson, and E Allan Lind. “It's a bet! A problem-solving approach promotes the construction of contingent agreements.” Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin 31, no. 8 (August 2005): 1039–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204274099.
       Full Text
    • Van den Bos, Kees, and E Allan Lind. “Fairness heuristic theory is an empirical framework: a reply to Arnadóttir.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 45, no. 3 (July 2004): 265–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00404.x.
       Full Text
    • Maguire, L. A., and E. Allan Lind. “Public participation in environmental decisions: Stakeholders, authorities and procedural justice.” International Journal of Global Environmental Issues 3, no. 2 (January 1, 2003): 133–48. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGENVI.2003.003861.
       Full Text
    • Bos, K. van den, and E. A. Lind. “Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 34 (January 1, 2002): 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x.
       Full Text
    • Kray, L. J., and E. Allan Lind. “The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others' experiences in organizational justice judgments.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 89, no. 1 (January 1, 2002): 906–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00035-3.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., and K. van den Bos. “When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management.” Research in Organizational Behavior 24 (January 1, 2002): 181–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-3085(02)24006-x.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E Allan, Laura Kray, and Leigh Thompson. “Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85, no. 2 (July 2001): 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2937.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A. “Thinking critically about justice judgments.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 58, no. 2 (April 1, 2001): 220–26. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1793.
       Full Text
    • Van Den Bos, K., and E. A. Lind. “The psychology of own versus others' treatment: Self-oriented and other-oriented effects on perceptions of procedural justice.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, no. 10 (January 1, 2001): 1324–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672012710008.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., J. Greenberg, K. S. Scott, and T. D. Welchans. “The winding road from employee to complainant: Situational and psychological determinants of wrongful-termination claims.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45, no. 3 (January 1, 2000): 557–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667109.
       Full Text
    • Tyler, T. R., E. A. Lind, and Y. J. Huo. “Cultural Values and Authority Relations: The Psychology of Conflict Resolution Across Cultures.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6, no. 4 (January 1, 2000): 1138–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.4.1138.
       Full Text
    • Tyler, T. R., Y. J. Huo, and E. A. Lind. “The two psychologies of conflict resolution: Differing antecedents of pre-experience choices and post-experience evaluations.” Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2, no. 2 (December 1, 1999): 99–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430299022001.
       Full Text
    • Smith, H. J., T. R. Tyler, Y. J. Huo, D. J. Ortiz, and E. A. Lind. “The Self-Relevant Implications of the Group-Value Model: Group Membership, Self-Worth, and Treatment Quality.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34, no. 5 (September 1, 1998): 470–93. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1360.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., L. Kray, and L. Thompson. “The Social Construction of Injustice: Fairness Judgments in Response to Own and Others' Unfair Treatment by Authorities.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 75, no. 1 (July 1998): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2785.
       Full Text
    • Vermunt, R., E. Blaauw, and E. A. Lind. “Fairness evaluations of encounters with police officers and correctional officers.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28, no. 12 (June 16, 1998): 1107–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01670.x.
       Full Text
    • Thompson, L., L. J. Kray, and E. A. Lind. “Cohesion and Respect: An Examination of Group Decision Making in Social and Escalation Dilemmas.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 34, no. 3 (May 1, 1998): 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1998.1351.
       Full Text
    • Tyler, T., E. A. Lind, K. I. Ohbuchi, I. Sugawara, and H. Yuen J. “Conflict with outsiders: Disputing within and across cultural boundaries.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 24, no. 2 (January 1, 1998): 137–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298242003.
       Full Text
    • Van Den Bos, K., H. A. M. Wilke, E. A. Lind, and R. Vermunt. “Evaluating outcomes by means of the fair process effect: Evidence for different processes in fairness and satisfaction judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, no. 6 (January 1, 1998): 1493–1503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1493.
       Full Text
    • Bos, K. van den, E. A. Lind, R. Vermunt, and H. A. Wilke. “How do I judge my outcome when I do not know the outcome of others? The psychology of the fair process effect.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72, no. 5 (May 1997): 1034–46. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.1034.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A. “Social Conflict and the Fairness Heuristic.” Representative Research in Social Psychology 21 (1997): 6–22.
    • Lind, E. A., K. Ohbuchi, I. Sugawara, and T. R. Tyler. “Goals and Tactics in Within- and Between-Culture Conflict.” Tohoku Psychologia Folia 56 (1997): 1–13.
    • Lind, E. A., T. R. Tyler, and Y. J. Huo. “Procedural context and culture: Variation in the antecedents of procedural justice judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73, no. 4 (January 1, 1997): 767–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.767.
       Full Text
    • Stalans, L., and E. Allan Lind. “The Meaning of Procedural Fairness: A Comparison of Taxpayers' and Representatives' Views of Their Tax Audits.” Social Justice Research 10, no. 3 (January 1, 1997): 311–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02683306.
       Full Text
    • Huo, Y. J., H. J. Smith, T. R. Tyler, and E. A. Lind. “Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer?” Psychological Science 7, no. 1 (January 1, 1996): 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00664.x.
       Full Text
    • Kulik, C. T., E. Allan Lind, M. L. Ambrose, and R. J. MacCoun. “Understanding gender differences in distributive and procedural justice.” Social Justice Research 9, no. 4 (January 1, 1996): 351–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02196990.
       Full Text
    • Vermunt, R., A. Wit, K. Van Den Bos, and E. A. Lind. “The effects of unfair procedure on negative affect and protest.” Social Justice Research 9, no. 2 (January 1, 1996): 109–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02198075.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., Y. J. Huo, and T. R. Tyler. “... And justice for all - Ethnicity, gender, and preferences for dispute resolution procedures.” Law and Human Behavior 18, no. 3 (June 1, 1994): 269–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499588.
       Full Text
    • Hollin, C., P. Van Koppen, and E. A. Lind. “Psychology, crime, & law.” Psychology, Crime &Amp; Law 1, no. 1 (January 1, 1994): ebi. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683169408411929.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A. “Procedural Justice and Culture: Evidence for Ubiquitous Process Concerns.” Zeitschrift Fur Rechtssoziologie 15 (1994): 24–36.
    • Lind, E. A., C. Kulik, M. Ambrose, and M. Park. “Individual and Corporate Dispute Resolution: Using Procedural Fairness as a Decision Heuristic.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38, no. 2 (1993): 224–51.
    • Lind, E. A., and P. C. Earley. “Procedural Justice and Culture.” International Journal of Psychology 27, no. 2 (January 1, 1992): 227–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599208246877.
       Full Text
    • Tyler, T. R., and E. A. Lind. “A relational model of authority in groups.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 25, no. C (January 1, 1992): 115–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60283-X.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., M. Ambrose, M. D. V. Park, and C. T. Kulik. “Perspective and procedural justice: Attorney and litigant evaluations of court procedures.” Social Justice Research 4, no. 4 (December 1, 1990): 325–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01126779.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., R. J. MacCoun, P. E. Ebener, W. L. F. Felstiner, D. R. Hensler, J. Resnik, and T. R. Tyler. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluation of Their Experiences in the Civil Justice System.” Law & Society Review 24, no. 4 (1990): 953–96.
    • Lind, E. A., R. Kanfer, and P. C. Earley. “Voice, Control, and Procedural Justice: Instrumental and Noninstrumental Concerns in Fairness Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59, no. 5 (January 1, 1990): 952–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.952.
       Full Text
    • Ross, W. H., D. E. Conlon, and E. A. Lind. “The Mediator as Leader: Effects of behavioral style and deadline certainty on negotiator behavior.” Group &Amp; Organization Management 15, no. 1 (January 1, 1990): 105–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960119001500108.
       Full Text
    • Tyler, T. R., and E. A. Lind. “Intrinsic Versus Community‐Based Justice Models: When Does Group Membership Matter?” Journal of Social Issues 46, no. 1 (January 1, 1990): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb00273.x.
       Full Text
    • Conlon, D. E., E. A. Lind, and R. I. Lissak. “Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19, no. 13 (January 1, 1989): 1085–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1989.tb01241.x.
       Full Text
    • Paese, P. W., E. A. Lind, and R. Kanfer. “Procedural fairness and work group responses to performance evaluation systems.” Social Justice Research 2, no. 3 (September 1, 1988): 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01054556.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., and F. E. McGovern. “The Discovery Survey.” Law and Contemporary Problems 51, no. 4 (1988): 48–82.
    • Kanfer, R., J. Sawyer, P. C. Earley, and E. A. Lind. “Fairness and participation in evaluation procedures: Effects on task attitudes and performance.” Social Justice Research 1, no. 2 (June 1, 1987): 235–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01048018.
       Full Text
    • Earley, P. C., and E. A. Lind. “Procedural Justice and Participation in Task Selection: The Role of Control in Mediating Justice Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52, no. 6 (January 1, 1987): 1148–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1148.
       Full Text
    • Leung, K., and E. A. Lind. “Procedural Justice and Culture. Effects of Culture, Gender, and Investigator Status on Procedural Preferences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50, no. 6 (June 1, 1986): 1134–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1134.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., and R. I. Lissak. “Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgments.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21, no. 1 (January 1, 1985): 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(85)90003-4.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., R. I. Lissak, and D. E. Conlon. “Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 13, no. 4 (January 1, 1983): 338–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1983.tb01744.x.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., and E. A. et al. “Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interest.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, no. 4 (January 1, 1980): 643–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.4.643.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., and L. Walker. “Theory testing, theory development, and laboratory research on legal issues.” Law and Human Behavior 3, no. 1–2 (March 1, 1979): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01039146.
       Full Text
    • CONLEY, J. M., W. M. OBARR, and E. A. LIND. “POWER OF LANGUAGE - PRESENTATIONAL STYLE IN THE COURTROOM.” Duke Law Journal, no. 6 (January 1, 1979): 1375–99.
       Link to Item
    • LINDEGREN, T. M., E. A. LIND, and D. C. WILLIAMS. “GROUP VOICE AND POLITICAL-PARTICIPATION.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5, no. 3 (January 1, 1979): 267–267.
       Link to Item
    • Lind, E. A., L. Walker, and J. Thibaut. “The Relation Between Procedural and Distributive Justice.” Virginia Law Review 65, no. 8 (1979): 1401–20.
    • Lind, E Allan, Bonnie E. Erickson, Nehemia Friedland, and Michael Dickenberger. “Reactions to Procedural Models for Adjudicative Conflict Resolution.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 22, no. 2 (June 1978): 318–39.
    • Lind, E. A., B. E. Erickson, J. Conley, and W. M. O’Barr. “Social attributions and conversation style in trial testimony.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36, no. 12 (1978): 1558–67. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.36.12.1558.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., B. E. Erickson, N. Friedland, and M. Dickenberger. “Reactions to Procedural Models for Adjudicative Conflict Resolution: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 22, no. 2 (January 1, 1978): 318–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/002200277802200207.
       Full Text
    • Erickson, B., E. A. Lind, B. C. Johnson, and W. M. O’Barr. “Speech style and impression formation in a court setting: The effects of "powerful" and "powerless" speech.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14, no. 3 (1978): 266–79.
    • O’Barr, W. M., John Conley, and Allan Lind. “The Power of Language: Presentational Style in the Courtroom.” Duke Law Journal 14 (1978): 266–79.
    • LIND, E. A. “PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW - RESEARCH FRONTIERS - BERMANT,G, NEMETH,C AND VIDMAR,N.” Contemporary Psychology 22, no. 9 (January 1, 1977): 645–47.
       Link to Item
    • Lind, E. A., C. A. Insko, and S. LaTour. “Persuasion, Recall and Thoughts.” Representative Research in Social Psychology 7 (1976): 67–78.
    • Lind, E. A., J. Thibaut, and L. Walker. “A Cross-Cultural Comparison of the Effect of Adversary and Nonadversary Processes on Bias in Legal Decision Making.” Virginia Law Review 62, no. 2 (1976): 271–83.
    • Worchel, S., E. A. Lind, and K. H. Kaufman. “Evaluations of group products as a function of expectations of group longevity, outcome of competition, and publicity of evaluations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31, no. 6 (June 1, 1975): 1089–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076952.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A. “The Exercise of Information Influence in Legal Advocacy.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 5, no. 2 (January 1, 1975): 127–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1975.tb01302.x.
       Full Text
    • Walker, L., S. Latour, E. A. Lind, and J. Thibaut. “Reactions of Participants and Observers to Modes of Adjudication.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 4, no. 4 (January 1, 1974): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1974.tb02809.x.
       Full Text
    • Lind, E. A., J. Thibaut, and L. Walker. “Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal Decision Making.” Harvard Law Review 86 (1972): 386–401.
    • Lind, E. A., J. Thibaut, and L. Walker. “Discovery and Presentation of Evidence in Adversary and Nonadversary Proceedings.” Michigan Law Review 71 (n.d.): 1129–44.

  • Book Sections

    • Lind, E. A., and D. Proudfoot. “Fairness Heuristic Theory, the Uncertainty Management Model, and Fairness at Work.” In Oxford Handbook of Justice in Work Organizations, edited by M. Ambrose and R. Cropanzano, 2014.
    • Lind, E. A., R. R. Kitzmiller, R. R. McDaniel, C. M. Johnson, and R. A. Anderson. “Exploring interpersonal behavior and team sensemaking during health information technology implementation.” In Leading in Health Care Organizations: Improving Safety, Satisfaction, and Financial Performance. Advances in Health Care Management, Vol. 14, edited by T. Simons, H. Leroy, and G. T. Savage, 119–46. Bingley, UK: Emerald Books, 2013.
    • Lind, E. A., and K. Van den Bos. “On Sense-Making Reactions and Public Inhibition of Benign Social Motives: An Appraisal Model of Prosocial Behavior.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by J. Olson and M. Zanna, 48:1–58. San Diego: Academic Press, 2013.
    • Lind, E. A. “Culture and Fairness: Some Possible Dynamics of Cultural Variation in the Psychology of Fairness.” In Inequality, Discrimination, and Conflict in Japan:  Ways to Social Justice and Cooperation, edited by K. Ohbuchi and N. Asai. Victoria, AU: Transpacific Press, 2011.
    • Lind, E. A., and C. T. Kulik. “Hear me out: Voice and justice.” In Voice and Silence in Organizations, edited by J. Greenberg and M. Edwards, 135–56. Oxon, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009.
    • Lind, E. A., and K. Van den Bos. “The social psychology of fairness and the regulation of personal uncertainty.” In Handbook of the Uncertain Self, edited by R. M. Arkin, K. C. Oleson, and P. J. Carroll, 122–41. New York: Psychology Press, 2009.
    • Lind, E. A., W. L. F. Felstiner, B. Pettit, and N. Olsen. “The effect of lawyer gender on client perceptions of lawyer behavior.” In Women in the Legal Profession: A Challenge to Law and Lawyers, edited by U. Schultz and G. Shaw. Oxford, UK: Hart, 2003.
    • Lind, E. A. “Fairness judgments as cognitions.” In The Justice Motive in Everyday Life, edited by M. Ross and D. Miller, 416–32. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    • Lind, E. A., and K. Van den Bos. “When fairness works: Toward a general theory of uncertainty management.” In Research in Organizational Behavior, edited by B. M. Staw and R. M. Kramer, 24:181–224. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press, 2002.
    • Lind, E. A. “Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations.” In Advances in Organizational Justice, edited by J. Greenberg and R. Cropanzano, 56–88. Stanford University Press, 2001.
    • Lind, E. A., and T. R. Tyler. “Understanding the nature of fraternalistic deprivation: Does group-based deprivation involve fair outcomes or fair treatment?” In Relative Deprivation:  Specification, Development, and Integration, edited by I. Walker and H. J. Smith, 44–65. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
    • Lind, E. A., and T. R. Tyler. “Procedural justice.” In The Justice Reader of the Handbooks of Law and Social Science, edited by J. Saunders and V. L. Hamilton, 65–92. New York: Plenum, 2001.
    • Lind, E. A. “Social Justice.” In Encyclopedia of Psychology, edited by A. E. Kazdin, 346–47. New York: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2000.
    • Lind, E. A., and J. Greenberg. “The pursuit of organizational justice: From conceptualization to implication to application.” In I/O Psychology: What We Know about Theory and Practice, edited by C. L. Cooper and E. A. Locke, 72–105. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 2000.
    • Lind, E. A. “Social involvement, justice judgments, and the psychology of negotiation.” In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, edited by R. Lewicki, R. Bies, and B. Sheppard, 8:125–39. JAI Press, 1999.
    • Lind, E. A. “Social Involvement, Justice Judgments, and the Psychology of Negotiation.” In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, edited by R. Lewicki, R. Bies, and B. Sheppard, 125–39. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1999.
    • Lind, E. A. “Procedural justice, disputing, and reactions to legal authorities.” In Everyday Practices and Problem Cases, edited by A. Sarat, M. Constable, D. Engel, H. Vans, and S. Lawrence, 177–98. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1998.
    • Lind, E. A. “Litigation and claiming—Antisocial behavior or legitimate regulation?” In Antisocial Behavior in Organizations, edited by R. Giacalone and J. Greenberg, 150–71. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1997.
    • Lind, E. A. “Verfahrensgerechtigkeit und Akzeptanz rechtlicher Autorität (Procedural justice and the acceptance of legal authority).” In Verfahrens-Gerechtigkeit: Rechtspsychologische Forschungsbeiträge Für Die Justizpraxis, edited by G. Bierbrauer, W. Gottwald, and B. Bimbreier-Stahlberger, 3–19. Köln, 1995.
    • Lind, E. A. “Justice and authority in organizations.” In Politics, Justice, and Support:  Managing the Social Climate of Work Organizations, edited by R. Cropanzano and K. M. Kacmar, 83–96. Westport, CT: Quorum, 1995.
    • Lind, E. A. “A relational model of authority in groups.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by M. Zanna, 25:115–92. New York: Academic Press, 1992.
    • Lind, E. A., R. J. MacCoun, and T. R. Tyler. “Alternative dispute resolution in the courts.” In The Handbook of Law and Psychology, edited by D. Kagehiro and W. Laufer, 95–118. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1992.
    • Lind, E. A., and T. R. Tyler. “Procedural Processes and Legal Institutions.” In Social Justice in Human Relations Volume 1: Societal and Psychological Origins of Justice, Vol. 2. Springer, 1991.
    • Lind, E. A. “Procedural processes and legal institution.” In Social Justice in Human Relations (Vol.2): Societal and Psychological Consequences of Justice and Injustice, edited by H. Steemsma and R. Vermunt. New York: Plenum, 1991.
    • Lind, E. A. “Substantive contributions to federal court policy and procedures: Internal channels for psychological research.” In The Impact of Social Psychology on Procedural Justice, edited by M. Kaplan, 40–55. Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas, 1986.
    • Lind, E. A. “Randomized experiments in the federal courts.” In New Directions for Evaluation Research, edited by R. Boruch. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
    • Lind, E. A., and G. Y. Ke. “Opening statements and closing arguments.” In The Psychology of Evidence and Courtroom Procedure, edited by S. Kassin and L. Wrightsman, 229–52. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
    • Lind, E. A., and L. Walker. “Psychological studies of procedural models.” In Progress in Applied Social Psychology, edited by G. Stephenson and J. Davis, 293–313. Chichester, England: Wiley and Sons, 1984.
    • Lind, E. A., and L. Walker. “Procedural theory and empirical research.” In Rechtssoziologie Und Prozessrech, edited by G. Roth, 245–70. Verlag Orac, 1983.
    • Lind, E. A. “The psychology of courtroom procedure.” In The Psychology of the Courtroom, edited by R. Bray and N. Kerr, 13–38. New York: Academic Press, 1982.
    • Lind, E. A. “The Psychology of Courtroom Procedure.” In The Psychology of the Courtroom, edited by R. Bray and N. Kerr, 13–38. Academic Pr, 1982.
    • Lind, E. A., and G. B. Melton. “Procedural justice in family court: Does the adversary model make sense?” In Child and Youth Services and the Law, edited by G. Melton. New York: Haworth Press, 1982.
    • O’Barr, W. M., and E. A. Lind. “Ethnography and Experimentation–Partners in Legal Research.” In The Jury, Judicial, and Trial Processes, edited by Bruce Dennis Sales. New York: Plenum, 1981.
    • O’Barr, W. M., and E Allan Lind. “The Social Significance of Speech in the Courtroom.” In Language and Social Psychology, edited by Howard Giles and Robert St Claire. Oxford: Basil Blackwell and Mott; Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979.
    • Lind, E. A., K. Van den Bos, and H. Wilke. “The psychology of procedural justice and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory.” In Justice in the Workplace: Volume II—From Theory to Practice, edited by R. Cropanzano, 49–66. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, n.d.

  • Conference Papers

    • Lind, E. A. “Social involvement, justice judgments, and the psychology of negotiation.” In Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol 7  1999, edited by R. J. Bies, R. J. Lewicki, and B. H. Sheppard, 7:125–39. JAI PRESS INC, 1999.
       Link to Item
    • Bos, Kees van den, Henk A. M. Wilke, and E Allan Lind. “When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority.” In Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75:1449–58. American Psychological Association (APA), 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1449.
       Full Text

Some information on this profile has been compiled automatically from Duke databases and external sources. (Our About page explains how this works.) If you see a problem with the information, please write to Scholars@Duke and let us know. We will reply promptly.